BT
x Your opinion matters! Please fill in the InfoQ Survey about your reading habits!

What Makes Haskell Worth Learning for Real World Applications

by Sadek Drobi on  Jan 25, 2009 2

One of co-authors of the Real World Haskell book, John Goerzen, talks in a recent interview to O’Reilly about purity, laziness, recursiveness and many other subjects that make Haskell worth learning but may also be a source of reluctance for people coming from object oriented or imperative programming.

Programming Languages: 2008 Review and Prospects for 2009

by Sadek Drobi on  Jan 09, 2009 5

In the beginning of last year, Ehud Lamm launched on Lamba the Ultimate a thread about programming languages predictions for 2008. Several subjects popped up: concurrency, functional programming, future of Java, Ruby, C++, and many others… What really happened in 2008 and what are the prospects for 2009? Bloggers have addressed these questions on demand of James Iry, echoing at last year thread.

Interview: Ted Neward on Present and Past Languages

by Abel Avram on  Oct 23, 2008 4

In this interview filmed during QCon London 2008, Ted Neward, author of "Effective Enterprise Java", talks about languages, statical, dynamical, objectual or functional. He dives into Java, C#, C++, Haskell, Scala, VB, and Lisp, to name some of them, comparing the benefits and disadvantages of using one or another.

Interview: Simon Peyton Jones on Programming Languages and Research Work

by Sadek Drobi on  Sep 25, 2008

In this QCon London 2008 interview, computer scientist and researcher Simon Peyton Jones discusses properties of functional programming languages, and particularly Haskell, that have inspired some features in mainstream languages. He gives his opinion on the issues of syntax and language complexity and talks about some research work on subjects such as data parallelism and transactional memory.

Programming Languages: More Powerful with Less Freedom?

by Sadek Drobi on  Mar 21, 2008 2

In quest for more power, languages are often grown with new features. While it provides programmer with more freedom, does this actually achieve more power? Reg Braithwaite believes that this is not necessarily true and argues that it is possible to render language more powerful yet limiting options offered to programmers.

Debate about Testing and Recoverability: Object Oriented vs. Functional Programming Languages

by Sadek Drobi on  Mar 05, 2008 1

In his latest blog post, Michael Feathers argued that object oriented programming languages offer some built-in features that facilitate testing and are therefore more recovery friendly than functional languages. Proponents of functional languages expressed strong disagreement with this statement, which provoked a very passionate debate in the blog community.

Designing for flexibility and robustness: Asynchronous message model, OOP and Functional Programming

by Sadek Drobi on  Nov 15, 2007 4

According to Pragmatic Programmers it is preferable in OOP to avoid design based on returning values. Michael Feathers argues that it may also be better to use the asynchronous message model that might be instrumental for improving adaptability and robustness. This maps well to the Erlang model though opposing some of the principles of pure functional programming.

Haskell the next language for Rubyists?

by Alexis Midon on  Mar 16, 2007 5

Now that Ruby holds no secrets from him, Antonio Cangiano explains why and how Haskell will satisfy his passion for language learning.

General Feedback
Bugs
Advertising
Editorial
InfoQ.com and all content copyright © 2006-2014 C4Media Inc. InfoQ.com hosted at Contegix, the best ISP we've ever worked with.
Privacy policy
BT