BT
x Your opinion matters! Please fill in the InfoQ Survey about your reading habits!
rss

SOA Practioners Should Define Standards First

by Mark Little on  Jan 31, 2010 1

Standards are often cited as important, helping to prevent vendor lock-in and allow for interoperability between heterogeneous implementations. However, as Steve Jones points out recently, it is still common for many SOA practitioners to ignore selecting standards at the start of the SOA lifecyle. In this article he outlines where standards should fit in and how REST is no exception to this rule.

Web Services Test Forum Announced

by Mark Little on  Dec 09, 2008 1

IBM, Oracle, Red Hat and others have just announced the formation of the Web Services Test Forum, a venue for continuous testing of interoperability for heterogeneous Web Services implementations as well as a flexible way for vendors and customers to define the interoperability scenarios that are important for them. But how does this relate to WS-I and why has Microsoft not signed up to it yet?

Interview: Mark Little on Transactions, Web Services, and REST

by Stefan Tilkov on  Jun 24, 2008 17

In this interview, recorded at QCon London 2008, Red Hat Director of Standards and Technical Development Manager for the SOA platform Mark Little talks about extended transaction models, the history of transaction standardization, their role for web services and loosely coupled systems, and the possibility of an end to the Web services vs. REST debate.

Should developers write their own transaction coordination logic?

by Jean-Jacques Dubray on  Jan 15, 2008 3

In a recent discussion Mark Little and Greg Pavlik discuss whether transaction coordinators and transaction protocols are necessary in the context of widely distributed units of work. Isn't the knowledge of state alignment patterns enough?

What does the term ESB actually mean?

by Jean-Jacques Dubray on  Sep 29, 2007 3

In his blog, Nick Allen, program manager in the Connected Systems Division at Microsoft, went on to collect several definitions and clarify Microsoft's position on the question.

Are Cross-Service Transactions A Violation of the Autonomous Tenet of Service Orientation?

by Jean-Jacques Dubray on  Jul 19, 2007 5

This question prompted a heated debate on MSDN in the wake of the release of the first web service transaction standard last May. Juval Löwy from IDesign, Arnon Rotem-Gal-Oz and others exchange their arguments as they answer the question.

Sun demonstrates WS-AT interoperability with Microsoft

by Mark Little on  Apr 26, 2007 1

Sun's latest Project Tango release includes WS-AtomicTransaction and WS-Coordination support. They also have demonstrated interoperability .NET 3.0 clients.

WS-TX as an OASIS standard

by Mark Little on  Apr 18, 2007

OASIS approves the Web Services Transactions committee specifications as a new standard and the TC co-chair blogs about its history.

Article: A History of Extended Transactions

by Diana Plesa on  May 09, 2006 6

ACID transactions don't work for long-lived use cases. This article documents historic approaches taken in the CORBA and J2EE communities toward extended transactions, how SOA is a more natural fit, and why WS-TX & WS-CAF may finally hold the answer.

General Feedback
Bugs
Advertising
Editorial
InfoQ.com and all content copyright © 2006-2014 C4Media Inc. InfoQ.com hosted at Contegix, the best ISP we've ever worked with.
Privacy policy
BT