Jimmy Nilsson makes a case for DDD explaining that while DDD uses some similar elements as DB-driven design does, for example, entities and repositories, the difference is in how they are used, the way the design is approached and elaborated, building on collaboration and feedback, incorporating deep domain knowledge, having as end result: reduced complexity, testability, and maintainability.
In this article, Jimmy Nilsson describes an architectural style that he has observed slowly growing in popularity over the last few years, a style that he calls Chunk Cloud Computing.
In this interview, Jimmy focuses on LINQ to SQL and ORM. Jimmy has tried to create a similar technology to LINQ to SQL in the past, but without similar results. While LINQ to SQL is a step in the right direction, .NET still lags behind other programming languages in object-relational mapping capabilities.
Jimmy Nilsson, author of 'Applying Domain-Driven Design', talks about the value proposition of Domain Driven Design and how DDD integrates with Agile. Jimmy also answers questions on OOD vs. DDD and the symbiotic relationship of domain specific relationships with DDD.
