BT
x Your opinion matters! Please fill in the InfoQ Survey about your reading habits!

Article: The Box: A Shortcut to finding Performance Bottlenecks

by Floyd Marinescu on Sep 24, 2007 |
Quite often performance problems will be reported with some very antidotal comments that do nothing to help you understand where to start looking. Faced with this dilemma, it is not uncommon for teams to start guessing at the root cause.

Performance tuning specialist Kirk Pepperdine has shared one of his own approaches for starting to find the true cause of performance problems: "the box" - a little diagram that is an abstraction of a complete system. The box is a reminder of the true causes of performance bottlenecks.

Read  The Box: A Shortcut to finding Performance Bottlenecks.

The has 4 layers: People, Application, Java Virtual Machine, and Hardware. Each of these layers has a role in systems performance, and Kirk talks about when   The purpose of the box is to eliminate guessing by showing us how to sequence an investigation.

Kirk advocates a bottom to top investigative process, the goal of which is to eliminate as many potential sources for the bottlenecks as can possibly eliminated before we start looking at the code.

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Tell us what you think

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

So what's new? by James Richardson

This chat doesn't really deserve its own nomenclature does it? "The Box" == "The box of obvious stuff".
- Look at system load
- Use some system tools
- Java has gc.
- creating zillions of threads can be harmful.

Re: So what's new? by Dmytro Dyachuk

The author did not mention that using synchronized methods locks the whole instance of the class and very often causes significant performance degradation.

WBR, Dmytro

The box is ok, but really you shouldn't be in this position by Morten Udnæs

Handling performance requirements is vital part of any software development effort. If you end up needing the "box" someone hasn't done their job properly.

In terms of fixing bad performance, I don't agree that you should go from bottom and upwards. It doesn't help to tune the hardware, VM and database of an application thats badly designed/constructed. Usually you have to work both ways (both at application level and infrastructure level) at the same time, and choose what gives most effect and lowest risk.

Final advice: Get real volumes of data and measure!

Re: The box is ok, but really you shouldn't be in this position by Kirk Pepperdine

Handling performance requirements is vital part of any software development effort. If you end up needing the "box" someone hasn't done their job properly.


I think this comment is a bit unfair. It is like saying that bugs are because someone hasn't done their job properly. There are many reasons why performance problems creep into for many reasons. For example, concurrency issues often can't be found until you start integration testing. At that point you maybe into a full diagnostic effort on the application. This is a normal course of development in an imperfect world

In terms of fixing bad performance, I don't agree that you should go from bottom and upwards. It doesn't help to tune the hardware


The article isn't about tuning, it is about a process of diagnostics, understanding that you really do have a problem with the DB as well as determining if the problem is caused by your application or by the DB its self.

The process is about ensuring consistency of results in your tuning efforts so that you're not wasting time fixing phantom problems. This, IME is the lowest risk way to proceed.

Kind regards,
Kirk

Re: So what's new? by Kirk Pepperdine

This chat doesn't really deserve its own nomenclature does it? "The Box" == "The box of obvious stuff".


At one time I might have agreed with this. However I have found that people have found this visualization of the *obviously* useful. It is a rough abstraction, it is flawed but even so....

Kind regards,
Kirk

Re: So what's new? by soorej mg

Hi Kirk,

This article is really useful!!..

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

6 Discuss

Educational Content

General Feedback
Bugs
Advertising
Editorial
InfoQ.com and all content copyright © 2006-2014 C4Media Inc. InfoQ.com hosted at Contegix, the best ISP we've ever worked with.
Privacy policy
BT