New-age Transactional Systems - Not Your Grandpa's OLTP
John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.
The content has been bookmarked!
There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.
Posted by Dionysios G. Synodinos on Mar 23, 2009
In this interview made during QCon SF 2008, Tim Bray talks about why he is not convinced with the buzz surrounding Rich Internet Applications and shares his ideas on Cloud Computing. He also expresses his opinion regarding the debate REST vs. WS-* and the future directions web technologies will be taking.
Watch: Tim Bray on the Future of the Web (32 min.)
Tim Bray also addresses the way web technologies are affected by the current economic turmoil and gives his insight into which paradigms he sees going forward in these challenging times.
Dionysios G. Synodinos is a Web Engineer and a freelance consultant, focusing on Web technologies
SCM best practices for multiple processes, releases & distributed teams
Maximize your business-responsiveness with Mingle. Provide your global development team a shared space that adapts to the way they work.
i enjoyed the discussion - thanks
Hi,
the video stops after or during the answer to the second question.
Regards
Marc
Hi Marc,
I just tested the video and everything seems to be working just fine.
Diana (InfoQ)
I love the irony of this interview. Tim Bray is talking about web usability and the interview is posted to one of the most unusable, poorly designed websites I have ever seen in my life. Do you guys have any idea what you are doing?
Take this quote from the interview: "Oh it was so great when the vendors all brought in the web interfaces because it forced them to get rid of all these weird cascading menus and options that nobody ever used, [...] I think a dollar with that kind of richness is worth a thousand dollars of things that wiggle when you put the mouse over them."
And how is the interview presented in this javascript-abusing, godawful website? I have to read through a key hole and click on worthless little widgets. This is extremely counter-productive and annoying.
You guys need to take a lesson from Tim and lay out your website in some reasonable way.
... the interview is posted to one of the most unusable, poorly designed websites I have ever seen in my life. Do you guys have any idea what you are doing?
...
And how is the interview presented in this javascript-abusing, godawful website? I have to read through a key hole and click on worthless little widgets. This is extremely counter-productive and annoying.
You guys need to take a lesson from Tim and lay out your website in some reasonable way.
I cannot disagree more, Jeff. Oh, and by the way, the Tim's interview was fantastic.
I've been using InfoQ for several years and love the cleanliness and usability of the site. In fact, I'd venture to say that it's a model for information-rich, mixed media presentation and interaction. Their combination of video and textual presentation of interviews is fantastic. Click on text you want to hear again and the video resets to that point.
Jeff, I challenge you to post a single link to a website you had any part in developing that rivals InfoQ.
I agree that infoqs video content is reasonably well-presented. It really begs for some transcripts though.
... the interview is posted to one of the most unusable, poorly designed websites I have ever seen in my life. Do you guys have any idea what you are doing?
...
And how is the interview presented in this javascript-abusing, godawful website? I have to read through a key hole and click on worthless little widgets. This is extremely counter-productive and annoying.
You guys need to take a lesson from Tim and lay out your website in some reasonable way.
I cannot disagree more, Jeff. Oh, and by the way, the Tim's interview was fantastic.
I've been using InfoQ for several years and love the cleanliness and usability of the site. In fact, I'd venture to say that it's a model for information-rich, mixed media presentation and interaction. Their combination of video and textual presentation of interviews is fantastic. Click on text you want to hear again and the video resets to that point.
Jeff, I challenge you to post a single link to a website you had any part in developing that rivals InfoQ.
+1
I agree that infoqs video content is reasonably well-presented. It really begs for some transcripts though.
But … there is a transcript?!
People who live completely in the "Enterprise" world seem to forget what usability means, and care only that you have as much info crammed into one space as possible. Whether we are talking about some horribly over engineered software bus(ESB) or a web page that has a dozen boxes of content strewn about the screen resulting in a cluttered mess (As is the case here).
And don't give me the "Show me your great website then" crap. Look at many other professional sites (Google search, Cisco's page, Lockheed, or about 90% of other big businesses), you'll notice they are clean and simple with actual room for whitespace, and clearly defined navigation areas, with most of the area devoted to content. There are obvious offenders though like Yahoo, and to a lesser extent Amazon.
Also anyone who thinks it's a great idea to put the actual content users are trying to read in little 2 inch boxes is deluding themselves. Although I doubt sane comments will be worthwhile to anyone defending the usability of this site, since they all seem to have classical confirmation bias working against reality.
I agree that infoqs video content is reasonably well-presented. It really begs for some transcripts though.
But … there is a transcript?!
Ha ha, incredibly clean and usable site. Except that not even people who prefer a 'rich' layout can find anything on it :-D
oh wow, I take it all back, hah! yeah that plus button really needs to be a different color or something. (:embarassed face:)
Yakov Fain has a detailed response to Tim's comments: flexblog.faratasystems.com/?p=404
Gee, I don't get what your problem is with InfoQ. If you have orientation problems with this simple and clean layout, you are in real trouble. Don't participate in traffic with any vehicle, that's all I can say!
Apparently, you actually seem to enjoy posting. How on earth did you figure this one out... :-D
I couldn't agree more with Yakov, people that negate the advances of RIA are simply looking in their rear view mirror. Note that most of the REST community is actually on board with that as no one talks about using HATEOAS, which according to Roy is the core of REST, and everyone promoting the use HTTP in an RPC mode (a.k.a lo-REST).
I think Yakov is mistaken and here is why: nolanevans.blogspot.com/2009/04/i-dont-think-th...
John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.
Kevlin Henney examines code samples to see what can be learned from them starting from the premise that one won’t write great code unless he knows how to read it.
Jason Ayers share the observations he made watching a team of developers collaborating in real time on the same code base, pushing XP, pair programming and continuous integration to their extremes.
Michael Snoyman presents Yesod, a web framework written in Haskell and containing a web server, templating, ORM, libraries (templating, gravatar, etc.).
Richard Kreuter and Kyle Banker on how to avoid classical RDBMS transactional systems by using compensation mechanisms, transactional messaging or transactional procedures.
Attila Szegedi talks about performance tuning Java and Scala programs at Twitter: how to approach GC problems, the importance of asynchronous I/O, when to use MySQL/Cassandra/Redis, and much more.
One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.
InfoQ spoke to the authors of Software Systems Architecture on a couple of new topics, the System Context viewpoint and Agile, which have been added to the second edition.
15 comments
Watch Thread Reply