BT

Facilitating the Spread of Knowledge and Innovation in Professional Software Development

Write for InfoQ
News Articles Presentations Podcasts Guides

Topics

Choose your language

QCon New York

Find real-world practical inspiration from the world’s most innovative software leaders. Attend in-person or online.
QCon San Francisco

Learn what's next in software from world-class leaders pushing the boundaries. Attend in-person or online.
The Software Architects' Newsletter

Your monthly guide to all the topics, technologies and techniques that every professional needs to know about. Subscribe for free.

InfoQ Homepage News Mono 1.2 release with thoughts from Miguel de Icaza

QCon New York (June 13-15): Learn best practices from senior developers at early adaptor companies.

Mono 1.2 release with thoughts from Miguel de Icaza

Bookmarks

Nov 14, 2006 1 min read

Write for InfoQ

Join a community of experts. Increase your visibility.
Grow your career.Learn more

Last week Mono hit its 1.2 release.  Novell uses Mono in server form for both ZenWorks and iFolder in its Suse Linux Enterprise 10 platform.  This release was primarily focused on performance and scalability improvements.  Enhancements can be found across the board in support for Windows Forms and System.Drawing, .NET 2.0 parity in C#, and debugger support for both X86 and X64.

With this release, we've solved an important issue by making it easier to translate the Microsoft user interfaces to Linux, an important contribution in increasing the number of client-side Linux applications,” said Miguel de Icaza, vice president of developer platforms at Novell and maintainer of the Mono project. “Now feature complete, Mono has matured to the point that we believe the migration from ASP.NET and Windows Forms to Linux is easier than ever before and gives developers access to all the added benefits of Linux.

InfoQ spoke to Miguel to find out more about the release.  On what's new in 1.2, Miguel explained:

Windows.Forms 1.2, complete System.Drawing, much higher performance, ports to many new architectures, generics, C# 2.0 and preview for a lot of the 2.0 APIs.  Full details are here:  http://www.go-mono.com/archive/1.2/

On interesting uses of mono around the net:

Unity (www.unity3d.com), wiki.com (the engine behind the DekiWiki in Wiki.Com), http://www.govtrack.us/ (tracking the US congress) and of course our own applications Beagle (http://beagle-project.org/Main_Page), F-Spot (f-spot.org) and Banshee
(http://banshee-project.org/Discover/Home)

Asked about the impact of the Novell-MS announcement, Miguel answered that it's too soon to tell (it just happened last week), but "at least a big part of our agreement (Office XML support) is being done with Mono."

Development is now shifting towards Mono 2.0, code name “Sirloin”.  The planned featureset inclues:

Mono 2.0: Core

  • .NET 2.0 API support
  • Compact GC
  • More performance and scalability improvements
  • MonoDevelop including debugger support
  • MacOS X and X-Code support improvements
  • Support for WCF (codenamed Olive)

Gtk#

  • Databinding support
  • .NET binding for Gnome APIs

Languages:

  • VB Compiler
  • C# Generics support
  • GCC-based Compilers

Thanks Miguel and congratulations to the entire Mono team on a succesful release!

Rate this Article

Adoption
Style

This content is in the Java topic

Related Topics:

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Community comments

  • Java and Mono both under GPL?

    by Cameron Purdy,

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    Two sides to the coin:

    - With Java GPL'd, maybe Mono finally gets a decent VM

    - With Java GPL'd, there is no reason to keep Mono

    Peace,

    Cameron Purdy
    Tangosol Coherence: Distributed Caching for Java and .NET

    Back to top
  • Re: Java and Mono both under GPL?

    by paul browne,

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    I'd have to disagree with Cameron - there are lots of GPL Languages already , and nobody ever suggested that GNU version of C or C++ was going to disappear when Mono appeared under the GPL.

    As a Java Developer , I'm looking forward to some of the 'Mashups' that will now (technically and Legally) be possible between the languages. Top of my wishlist would be a version of C# that runs within the JVM (a bit like JRuby does). C# and Java are already syntactically close, and that would reduce the cost of switching back and forward even further.

    Paul, Technology in Plain English

    Back to top

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

BT