Oracle to End Free Support for Past Java Versions Much Sooner

| by Ben Evans Follow 16 Followers on Jan 30, 2018. Estimated reading time: 3 minutes |

A note to our readers: You asked so we have developed a set of features that allow you to reduce the noise: you can get email and web notifications for topics you are interested in. Learn more about our new features.

FREE eBook: Java Logging in Production

We all use logs to monitor our applications in production, but HOW we use them is a whole different question. This eBook covers the what, why and how of Java logging in production. Download Now.


Sponsored Content

Prior to Java 9, there was a period of overlap where the newly GA version was "bedded in", before declaring it the preferred version. Free updates would continue on the previous version, even after it lost its primary status, for a period of time (typically 12+ months) to allow a clean cutover. However with the change to a strict time-based schedule, which InfoQ reported on in the autumn, this traditional free support period has apparently also come to an end.

The old approach suited the ecosystem well - as in practice only teams who were directly dependent on a brand new feature migrated immediately. Even shops that wanted to upgrade aggressively tended to wait for at least a couple of minor updates. Modern software platforms are incredibly complex, and so it is entirely normal for there to be minor implementation flaws in a .0.0 release.

Many teams did not want to take the risk of immediate updates, and so this relaxed approach was a good fit for a range of risk appetites among application owners. When the new version contains eagerly-expected features (e.g. Java 8 lambdas), then the adoption curve is correspondingly steep, and for "nice-to-have" releases it is appreciably more shallow.

Since the switch to the new release process, it has emerged that Oracle's announced roadmaps seem to have some significant weaknesses that have not been addressed. It appears that Oracle's new roadmap diverges significantly from expectations and from all previous versions.

In a recent blog post, Simon Ritter from Azul Systems has produced this image, that shows the release cadence, in as far as it can be deduced from Oracle's public statements. The post also outlines Azul's proposed support solution.

SE Lifecycle

As it stands, there is no longer any grace period whereby a new version of Java is "bedded in" and continues to be supported. Instead, as soon as a new version is released, it becomes the default and production shops are expected to swap to it immediately if they want to be supported by Oracle for free - a "cliff-edge".

It should also be noted that, despite being developed under the old "train" release model, Java 9 has no long-term support options of any kind. No serious enterprise should be introducing Java 9 to their environment if they are not prepared to move from it again quickly - Oracle has made it very clear that it has no long-term future from their perspective.

Oracle spokesman, Donald Smith remarked on Twitter:

As with JDK 6 and JDK 7 Updates Projects in the past, if a suitable party steps forward to maintain the JDK 9 Updates series further once the final Oracle-led JDK 9 Update release has been published, we will discuss how to best enable such a transition on this Project's mailing list.

The reality of the situation is that the vast majority of Java shops in the world use free-to-purchase Java and have no formal support contract with Oracle or any other vendor. Oracle's strategy could be interpreted as an attempt to try to change this and force corporate customers towards commercial support contracts.

However, even if this is the intention, it is seemingly at odds with another aspect of the new Java release model. Oracle has announced explicitly that they will start shipping OpenJDK binaries as official releases from Java 10. This can only be a tacit acknowledgement of the fact that OpenJDK is now a drop-in replacement for OracleJDK.

InfoQ approached Oracle for comment, but they have not responded formally at press time.

Rate this Article

Adoption Stage

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Tell us what you think

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

oracle jdk by Incze Lajos

i suppose, this support plan is valid for the oracle jdk. what can be known about other jdk implementers, e.g. openjdk?

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

1 Discuss

Login to InfoQ to interact with what matters most to you.

Recover your password...


Follow your favorite topics and editors

Quick overview of most important highlights in the industry and on the site.


More signal, less noise

Build your own feed by choosing topics you want to read about and editors you want to hear from.


Stay up-to-date

Set up your notifications and don't miss out on content that matters to you