InfoQ

News

S Stands for Simple

Posted by Stefan Tilkov on Nov 21, 2006 03:20 PM

Community
SOA
Topics
Web Services
Tags
WSDL,
SOAP,
XML Schema

With a very funny blog post, written in the form of a dialogue between a Web services expert and a hypothetical developer, Pete Lacey has started an amazing chain of postings. Here is quick excerpt, but be sure to read the whole post ("SG" stands for "SOAP guy"):

SG: Forget what I said. From here on in we pass around coarse-grained messages—you like that term, coarse-grained?. Messages that conform to an XML Schema. We call the new style Document/Literal and the old style RPC/Encoded.

Dev: XML Schema?

SG: Oh, it’s all the rage. Next big thing. Take a look.

Dev: (Reads XML Schema spec). Saints preserve us! Alexander the Great couldn’t unravel that.

Among the many industry luminaries linking to Pete's post are Nelson Minar, who designed the SOAP-based Google APIs for both Google's search AdWords and says he'd never choose SOAP and WSDL again, IBM's Sam Ruby, who shows that REST as an alternative to SOAP is not without (fixable) problems, Sun's Tim Bray, and Ruby on Rails creator David Heinemeier Hansson.

Bill de hÓra's comment is a nice RESTafarian summary:

Which is worse, that everyone gets it now and we'll have REST startups in Q207, or that it took half a decade?

3 comments

Reply

Which is worse?... by Ken Pelletier Posted Nov 21, 2006 5:30 PM
Re: Which is worse?... by Stefan Tilkov Posted Nov 22, 2006 1:34 AM
hello by boran Boran Posted Jun 30, 2008 9:36 AM
  1. Back to top

    Which is worse?...

    Nov 21, 2006 5:30 PM by Ken Pelletier

    >Which is worse, that everyone gets it now and we'll have REST startups in Q207, or that it took half a decade? Unfortunately, even that may be a false choice. My experience is that not everyone gets it now... so it's actually worse than either of those alternatives, sadly. I'm not suggesting that SOAP is the wrong choice for all cases (sometimes you don't control the choice of protocol between you and your collaborators), but it's just that when it clearly *is* the wrong choice, it's still too often the first tool to come out of the toolbox, as if it were the only one available.

  2. Back to top

    Re: Which is worse?...

    Nov 22, 2006 1:34 AM by Stefan Tilkov

    While you're certainly right that there is still a lot of people who don't "get it", I do think that there's a lot more acceptance than, say, two years ago. Back then, even considering REST was considered weird ...

  3. Back to top

    hello

    Jun 30, 2008 9:36 AM by boran Boran

Exclusive Content

Rationalizing the Presentation Tier

Thin client paradigm characterized by web applications is a kludge that needs to be repudiated. Old compromises are no longer needed and it's time to move the presentation tier to where it belongs.

Agile Project Management: Lessons Learned at Google

In this presentation filmed during QCon 2007, Jeff Sutherland, the creator of Scrum, talks about his visit at Google to do an analysis of Google's first implementation of Scrum.

AtomServer – The Power of Publishing for Data Distribution

In this article, Bryon Jacob and Chris Berry introduce AtomServer, their implementation of a full-fledged Atom Store based on Apache Abdera, which is now available as open source.

An Introduction to Virtualization

It is easy to think that virtualization applies only to servers. In reality the recent resurgence of the concept is also being applied to networking, storage, and application infrastructure.

REST Anti-Patterns

In this article, Stefan Tilkov explains some of the most common anti-patterns found in applications that claim to follow a "RESTful" design and suggests ways to avoid them.

Choosing between Routing and Orchestration in an ESB

In this article, Adrien Louis and Marc Dutoo discuss the differences and relative merits of using orchestration vs. routing in a typical ESB setup, and discuss various implementation options.

Enterprise Batch Processing with Spring

Wayne Lund discusses batch processing, Spring Batch objectives and features, scenarios for usage, Spring Batch architecture, scaling, example code, failures and retrying, and the future roadmap.

User Story Estimation Techniques

Developer Jay Fields draws on his experiences as a ThoughtWorks consultant to describe effective user story estimation techniques.