New-age Transactional Systems - Not Your Grandpa's OLTP
John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.
The content has been bookmarked!
There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.
Posted by Deborah Hartmann Preuss on Dec 13, 2006
I'm excited to see tool vendors, and the open source community for that matter, are beginning to provide tools such as this to enable evolutionary database development. I believe that we are at the cusp of a new age when it comes to database development, we are finally starting to throw off the chains of traditional development and beginning to take pride in our work.How did Microsoft decide to take VSTS in this direction? We asked Sachin Rekhi, the Microsoft product manager responsible for VSTS:
When building these tools, we realized that while application development teams have successfully embraced agile development, the database development teams have really been lagging behind. In many ways, this has been due to the fact that the existing tools did not facilitate doing database development in an agile, iterative fashion.Database professionals have been leary of Agile practices... and perhaps with reason. Practices and tooling for database testing and refactoring were poor or non-existent in the early years of Agile methodologies. Consider the potentially disastrous and far-reaching implications of a database change. If one were to simply rename a column without adequate tool support, it could have tremendous unknown effects on stored procedures, triggers, and views that reference it. Rekhi says:
When we were deciding which role to target next, we looked at Team System’s strengths and looked for where the greatest opportunity was. ... We all know that the application and database development teams often tend to be the least integrated and sometimes have the worst channel of communication. We saw a huge opportunity to help bridge the gap between application and database development teams.
In addition, we realized that the hardest part of database development today really is managing database changes. Thus Team Edition for Database Professionals is primarily targeted at supporting iterative database development in a risk mitigating way.
I believe we have attacked the core of the problem by enabling confidence in database changes. Whether it’s through the use of the automated rename refactoring tool for making changes, or database unit tests to ensure no regressions in existing functionality have resulted, or even to the version control history of all revisions to schema objects, we have now removed that fear.How can a team get started with Agile database practices? The Agile Data site is a good online source of further information, particularly for database testing, and the agiledatabases yahoo group is a good place for novices to ask questions of people already applying the Agile Data practices.
Once people really see the power of these tools to increase their confidence in database changes, I think database professionals will be sold on the approach. [Now] I expect even greater traction in bringing the application and data tiers together in their quest for agility.
Refactoring Databases is an invaluable resource that shows data professionals just how they can leap ahead and confidently, safely embrace change. ... [it] outlines a set of prescriptive practices that show the professional DBA exactly how to bring this agile method into the design and development of databases. Scott’s and Pramod’s attention to the minute details of what it takes to actually implement every database refactoring technique proves that it can be done and paves the way for its widespread adoption. Thus, I propose a call to action for all data professionals. Read on, embrace change, and spread the word. Database refactoring is key to improving the data community’s agility.And for those who see a need to customize it before they can fit it into their process, good news: Microsoft rarely builds a product these days without providing extensibility points for others to build upon. Team System is no exception. See Rekhi's blog for a post about the extensibility points in Team Edition for Database Professionals.
Transforming Software Delivery: An IBM Rational Case Study
Agility at scale, become as agile as you can be
In today’s hyper-competitive world, later may be too late to adopt Agile development and this Roadmap for Success will help you get started. Download "Agile Development: A Manager's Roadmap for Success" now!
John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.
Kevlin Henney examines code samples to see what can be learned from them starting from the premise that one won’t write great code unless he knows how to read it.
Jason Ayers share the observations he made watching a team of developers collaborating in real time on the same code base, pushing XP, pair programming and continuous integration to their extremes.
Michael Snoyman presents Yesod, a web framework written in Haskell and containing a web server, templating, ORM, libraries (templating, gravatar, etc.).
Richard Kreuter and Kyle Banker on how to avoid classical RDBMS transactional systems by using compensation mechanisms, transactional messaging or transactional procedures.
Attila Szegedi talks about performance tuning Java and Scala programs at Twitter: how to approach GC problems, the importance of asynchronous I/O, when to use MySQL/Cassandra/Redis, and much more.
One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.
InfoQ spoke to the authors of Software Systems Architecture on a couple of new topics, the System Context viewpoint and Agile, which have been added to the second edition.
No comments
Watch Thread Reply