BT

ASP.NET AJAX Released: Will AJAX Finally Be Popular On ASP.NET?

by Jonathan Allen on Jan 26, 2007 |

According to the annual survey conducted in September by Ajaxian.com, ASP.NET developers lagged behind other AJAX-enabled implementations. Surprisingly 50% of respondents were using PHP on their AJAX-enabled sites, with Java scoring 37%. .NET was third with 16%, placing it just two points about Rails.

Of course, a lot of things have changed since September. In the four months since then ASP.NET AJAX has become a mature product with the same drag-and-drop design that has made ASP.NET so popular. And with their open client-side library, non-ASP developers can also leverage much of the framework.

As mentioned in previous articles, this is also Microsoft's most serious attempt at entering the open source market. In addition to the framework itself, Microsoft is shipping a control library based heavily on community contributions.

Even more surprisingly, Microsoft has released its proprietary source code for the server-side controls as well. Under the restrictive Microsoft Reference License, developers can see how key functionality such as the UpdatePanel is built.

According to Gavin Clarke of The Register, we can expect even more in the next version of Visual Studio.

ASP.NET AJAX 1.0 can be used with Visual Studio 2005, and plans are afoot to support the next edition of Microsoft's integrated development environment, codenamed Orcas. Visual Studio Orcas will feature client-side JavaScript intellisense, JavaScript compilation checking, and rich JavaScript debugging for APS.NET AJAX.

As for the question, "Why the AJAX adoption rate is so slow for ASP.NET developers?", one theory is that developers are hesitant to adopt frameworks that Microsoft is expected to replace. For example, once Sandcastle was announced, virtually all effort on nDoc ceased. Now that ASP.NET AJAX is live, developers should feel more confident about picking it up without the fear of being stuck with a dead-end framework.

 

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Tell us what you think

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread
Community comments

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

Discuss

Educational Content

General Feedback
Bugs
Advertising
Editorial
InfoQ.com and all content copyright © 2006-2014 C4Media Inc. InfoQ.com hosted at Contegix, the best ISP we've ever worked with.
Privacy policy
BT