InfoQ

InfoQ

News

My Bookmarks

Login or Register to enable bookmarks for unlimited time.

The content has been bookmarked!

There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.

Software AG Acquires webMethods

Posted by Stefan Tilkov on Apr 05, 2007

Sections
Architecture & Design,
Enterprise Architecture
Topics
Acquisitions ,
SOA
Tags
Software AG ,
webMethods ,
Infravio
German Software AG, Europe’s largest systems software and SOA platform provider has announced its (planned) acquisition of integration vendor webMethods, Inc., for approximately $546 million. The new company is very likely going to become a major player in the crowded SOA market, which has undergone some significant consolidation in the during the last year.

Software AG’s announcement suggests this is a major step towards their stated goal of becoming a €1 billion software company. According to Software AG CEO Karl-Heinz Streibich, the acquisition positions Software AG as one of the global leaders in SOA and BPM. He also stressed the expected foothold in the critical North American market that webMethods will bring to the company. This is another in a series of acquisitions that have occurred in the last 15 months, including the acquisition of SOA governance vendor Systinet by Mercury, which was in turn acquired by HP in July (see here and here for coverage on InfoQ). In September, webMethods acquired Systinet competitor Infravio, which now becomes part of Software AG as part of the webMethods deal.

As Software AG has its own governance solution with CentraSite, co-developed with Fujitsu, an obvious question is how this and the Infravio registry are going to be integrated. InfoQ had chance to question Ivo Totev, Vice President crossvision Product Strategy at SOA, about this, who highlighted the reliance on JAX-R as something that will pay off now:

In the mid term we will of course develop and support both products. Later we will combine best of both worlds. This is the beauty of standards - since both are based on JAX-R this will be achieved without rewriting the one or the other product. Customers will benefit from this strategy. No matter if CentraSite or Infravio: there is a clear upgrade path to future releases at the pace of our customers - and there is a clear path towards increased innvovation from the combined engineering team.

Totev highlighted webMethods' B2B, BAM and BPM capabilities, and Software AG's strength in SOA Enablement and Legacy Modernization.

Jason Bloomberg, Senior Analyst at ZapThink, shared his opinion with InfoQ:

This is huge news in the SOA space, because the combination of Software AG and webMethods is now second only to IBM in terms of both traditional integration and SOA capabilities. This is a marketshare play and a SOA play entirely. Software AG gets a much stronger North American presence, and they can now leave the likes of TIBCO and Oracle in their dust. Mark my words, Larry Ellison is not going to be happy about this news.

While we don't know about Larry Ellison's personal feelings, it will definitely be very interesting what kind of impact the combination of both companies can make in the SOA space.
  • This article is part of a featured topic series on SOA
Interesting news for people following SOA and XML by Frank Cohen Posted
Re: Interesting news for people following SOA and XML by miko matsumura Posted
Re: Interesting news for people following SOA and XML by miko matsumura Posted
  1. Back to top

    Interesting news for people following SOA and XML

    by Frank Cohen

    I've been following Software AG as publisher of an XQuery and native XML database platform that is good for building XML-oriented services. WebMethods has a good practice as a system integrator and publisher of process management tools. Aligning Infravio to CentraSite is going to prove if JAX-R implementations really are interoperable. (Where's Miko on this?)

    From my viewpoint the cosolidate market looks like this:

    BEA with AquaLogic "I'm an ESB, no?"
    Oracle with Fusion "The ring to rule all others" Middleware
    IBM with WebSphere "All these parts fit together, right?" and Tivoli
    Microsoft with BizTalk "I'm an ESB, right?" and .NET

    Those are the big platform plays. And the more system-integration-ish plays are now:

    Software AG: with WebMethods and Infravio
    Progress Software: with Sonic, DataDirect, Actional, etc.
    IONA: with Artix, Orbix, Celtix, etc.

    Of course, they all missed the purchase of Mercury Interactive for SOA Governance. I wonder where that puts HP?

    -Frank
    www.pushtotest.com

  2. Back to top

    Re: Interesting news for people following SOA and XML

    by miko matsumura

    (Where's Miko on this?)



    Well, unfortunately there are limits to what I can say at this stage as material public statements end up on the record with the SEC if they happen during the tender offer period. At least that's what I've been told.

    I can say that JAXR normalizes the highly interoperable UDDI standard with the semantically rich end-user driven ebXML Registry Repository model--and provides really a fantastically practical object oriented information model standard out there for SOA Registry Repository.

    Repository is a funny beastie as anything that stores state can be called one. But among the few standardized ways to build a repository in such a way as to preserve a standards based set of semantics around lifecycle management, auditing and some pretty interesting capabilities.

    Farrukh, who admittedly is an ebXML RR zealot posted the comparison here:
    ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/tmp/Registry_Capability...

    But of course the real approach is provider level 1 for JAXR which provides for 100% interop across both of these standards. So it's not an either-or in any case.

    Miko
    I've been following Software AG as publisher of an XQuery and native XML database platform that is good for building XML-oriented services. WebMethods has a good practice as a system integrator and publisher of process management tools. Aligning Infravio to CentraSite is going to prove if JAX-R implementations really are interoperable. (Where's Miko on this?)

    From my viewpoint the cosolidate market looks like this:

    BEA with AquaLogic "I'm an ESB, no?"
    Oracle with Fusion "The ring to rule all others" Middleware
    IBM with WebSphere "All these parts fit together, right?" and Tivoli
    Microsoft with BizTalk "I'm an ESB, right?" and .NET

    Those are the big platform plays. And the more system-integration-ish plays are now:

    Software AG: with WebMethods and Infravio
    Progress Software: with Sonic, DataDirect, Actional, etc.
    IONA: with Artix, Orbix, Celtix, etc.

    Of course, they all missed the purchase of Mercury Interactive for SOA Governance. I wonder where that puts HP?

    -Frank
    www.pushtotest.com
    I've been following Software AG as publisher of an XQuery and native XML database platform that is good for building XML-oriented services. WebMethods has a good practice as a system integrator and publisher of process management tools. Aligning Infravio to CentraSite is going to prove if JAX-R implementations really are interoperable. (Where's Miko on this?)

    From my viewpoint the cosolidate market looks like this:

    BEA with AquaLogic "I'm an ESB, no?"
    Oracle with Fusion "The ring to rule all others" Middleware
    IBM with WebSphere "All these parts fit together, right?" and Tivoli
    Microsoft with BizTalk "I'm an ESB, right?" and .NET

    Those are the big platform plays. And the more system-integration-ish plays are now:

    Software AG: with WebMethods and Infravio
    Progress Software: with Sonic, DataDirect, Actional, etc.
    IONA: with Artix, Orbix, Celtix, etc.

    Of course, they all missed the purchase of Mercury Interactive for SOA Governance. I wonder where that puts HP?

    -Frank
    www.pushtotest.com

  3. Back to top

    Re: Interesting news for people following SOA and XML

    by miko matsumura

    yick, sorry for the double block quotes at the end, that was an error.

    Miko

Educational Content

10 tips on how to prevent business value risk

One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.

Interview: Software Systems Architecture: Working With Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives

InfoQ spoke to the authors of Software Systems Architecture on a couple of new topics, the System Context viewpoint and Agile, which have been added to the second edition.

Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder

Alex Papadimoulis discusses ugly code, where it comes from, how to avoid it, and how to get rid of it.

Architecting Visa for Massive Scale and Continuous Innovation

John Davies examines Visa’s architecture and shows how enterprises have architected complex integrations incorporating Hadoop, memcached, Ruby on Rails, and others to deliver innovative solutions.

Max Protect: Scalability and Caching at ESPN.com

Sean Comerford unveils ESPN.com’s architecture, what components are used and why, and the current changes the website goes through.

The Seven Deadly Sins of Enterprise Agile Adoption

Are there repeated patterns of failure on Enterprise Agile Enablement efforts? Sanjiv and Arlen discuss Seven Deadly Sins to avoid when adopting Agile in an enterprise.

Questions for an Enterprise Architect

Erik Dörnenburg answers: What is Enterprise and Evolutionary Architecture?, discussing 4 issues: Turning strategy into execution, Ensuring conformance, Where do the architects sit? Buying or building?

Wrap Your SQL Head Around Riak MapReduce

Sean Cribbs explains what Map-Reduce and Riak are, why and how to use Map-Reduce with Riak, and how to convert SQL queries into their Map-Reduce equivalents.