New-age Transactional Systems - Not Your Grandpa's OLTP
John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.
The content has been bookmarked!
There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.
Posted by Jonathan Allen on Jul 04, 2007
In an effort to reduce the size of the Silverlight runtime, most of the non-generic collection types will be removed. These include types once considered essential to .NET programming including ArrayList, Hashtable, and Comparer.
According to Inbar Gazit of Microsoft's Base Class Library team, the non-generic collections are not going to ship with Silverlight 1.1. This means that while you can continue to use them with the main .NET distribution, they cannot be used in any assembly targeting Silverlight. The affected classes are:
Just to make it clear, Microsoft is not planning on removing these classes or marking them as obsolete in the main .NET distribution at this time.
In order to support scenarios such as data binding where the type is not necessarily known, the following non-generic interfaces will be kept in Silverlight.
Some generic collections have also been dropped from Silverlight. Inbar explains,
Three other generic types were also removed. Queue
, Stack and LinkedList were removed from Silverlight. In this case it wasn't because they were non-generic but because they are not considered to be part of the core set of types that we deemed essential to be provided with Silverlight. Remember that Silverlight is a very small download and should only include the smallest set of APIs that will allow for useful development. It's very simple to implement Queue and Stack using List and LinkedList is just a different implementation of List with different performance characteristics and so it's not an essential part of our core collections group.
Inbar also has a post on why generic collections should be used in traditional .NET programming and suggestions on making the change to an existing codebase.
Using Drools? See what you're missing! Get the Power of Drools with the Assurance of Red Hat
Agility at scale, become as agile as you can be
Why NoSQL? A primer on Managing the Transition from RDBMS to NoSQL
Agile Maturity Model Applied to Building and Releasing Software
John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.
Kevlin Henney examines code samples to see what can be learned from them starting from the premise that one won’t write great code unless he knows how to read it.
Jason Ayers share the observations he made watching a team of developers collaborating in real time on the same code base, pushing XP, pair programming and continuous integration to their extremes.
Michael Snoyman presents Yesod, a web framework written in Haskell and containing a web server, templating, ORM, libraries (templating, gravatar, etc.).
Richard Kreuter and Kyle Banker on how to avoid classical RDBMS transactional systems by using compensation mechanisms, transactional messaging or transactional procedures.
Attila Szegedi talks about performance tuning Java and Scala programs at Twitter: how to approach GC problems, the importance of asynchronous I/O, when to use MySQL/Cassandra/Redis, and much more.
One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.
InfoQ spoke to the authors of Software Systems Architecture on a couple of new topics, the System Context viewpoint and Agile, which have been added to the second edition.
No comments
Watch Thread Reply