New-age Transactional Systems - Not Your Grandpa's OLTP
John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.
The content has been bookmarked!
There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.
Posted by Jonathan Allen on Jul 18, 2007
One of the most lauded features in ASP.NET 2.0 is Master Pages. Master Pages serve as templates for a site, making it easier to create and maintain consistent style site-wide. They do have one drawback under VS 2005: they cannot be nested.
Nested master pages are essential for larger sites that have more than one layout. Without them, developers have to manually ensure the common elements in each master page such as banners and copyright notices are kept in sync.
It turns out that nested master pages are actually supported by ASP.NET 2.0 itself. It is only in the Visual Studio 2005 IDE where they cannot be used. Visual Studio 2008 adds full support for nested master pages, allowing developers to switch to this model without losing IDE support.
It should be noted that since this feature is in ASP.NET 2.0, developers will not need to deploy .NET 3.5 to their production servers. They merely need to ensure that the project is set to compile to .NET 2.0.
Scott Guthrie has a walk-through of nested master pages on his blog.
SCM best practices for multiple processes, releases & distributed teams
Using Drools? See what you're missing! Get the Power of Drools with the Assurance of Red Hat
When you say "can't be used in the Visual Studio 2005 IDE," you mean they don't work in the visual designer, right? So I can still develop nested master pages from VS2005... Right?
No matter - the visual designer is pretty crappy anyhow, I never used it :)
I actually found nested master pages in VS2005 to be quite useful. They keep you (and your team) away from the designer :D
You are correct, I misspoke in that regard.
"No matter - the visual designer is pretty crappy anyhow, I never used it :)"
I agree if we're talking about VS 2003. But the VS 2005 designer is awesome, I must say. It's very robust, and the tag breadcrumbs are great. I just wish VS 2005 would target .Net 1.1 without fiddling so I could use it with my legacy 1.1 project.
John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.
Kevlin Henney examines code samples to see what can be learned from them starting from the premise that one won’t write great code unless he knows how to read it.
Jason Ayers share the observations he made watching a team of developers collaborating in real time on the same code base, pushing XP, pair programming and continuous integration to their extremes.
Michael Snoyman presents Yesod, a web framework written in Haskell and containing a web server, templating, ORM, libraries (templating, gravatar, etc.).
Richard Kreuter and Kyle Banker on how to avoid classical RDBMS transactional systems by using compensation mechanisms, transactional messaging or transactional procedures.
Attila Szegedi talks about performance tuning Java and Scala programs at Twitter: how to approach GC problems, the importance of asynchronous I/O, when to use MySQL/Cassandra/Redis, and much more.
One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.
InfoQ spoke to the authors of Software Systems Architecture on a couple of new topics, the System Context viewpoint and Agile, which have been added to the second edition.
4 comments
Watch Thread Reply