Presentation: The Beauty of Ruby

Posted by Floyd Marinescu on Jul 05, 2007

Community

Ruby

Topics

Programming

Tags

Language Features

As Edd Dumbill wrote, "the subtle elegance of the Ruby idiom is a slowly appreciated and highly satisfying flavour." It's true that some of the best things about Ruby aren't obvious to newcomers. In this talk Glenn Vanderburg demonstrates some of the subtle beauty that experienced Rubyists know and love.

Watch The Beauty of Ruby (54 min)

The beauty points Glenn looks at are:

• Blocks
• Rich Yet Flexible Syntax
• Mixins
• Lisp-Y-ness
• Generalized Matching & Ruby's powerful case statement
• Classes and objects are "open" can be modified at runtime
• Metaprogramming features

Finally, looking at tradeoffs in the language's design, Glenn concludes that "We Rubyists lose some things due to Matz’ choices., but what we gain seems to make up for it. - Thanks Matz!"

1. Back to top

   Other dynamic languages

   Jul 11, 2007 10:25 AM by Carl Gundel

   Ruby is a great language. Rubyist should definitely not ignore some even more elegant languages like Smalltalk and LISP.

   Reply

2. Back to top

   Presentation Slides

   Jul 13, 2007 1:11 PM by Tamer Salama

   Great presentation. Any chance slides would be available for download?

   Reply

3. Back to top

   Good Presentation

   Jul 23, 2007 10:27 PM by Satish Talim

   I liked the presentation.

   Reply

4. Back to top

   trying to watch

   Jul 26, 2007 10:02 PM by lee h

   I would love to watch this, but with low bandwidth the buffering every ~5 secs is killing me...and would take WAY too long to get through it...I would love to be able to download it...any thoughts?

   Reply

5. Back to top

   Re: trying to watch

   Jul 27, 2007 10:41 PM by Larry Diehl

   Here's a textual summary =)
   
   larrytheliquid.com/2007/07/28/ruby-elegance-nua...
   
   

   I would love to watch this, but with low bandwidth the buffering every ~5 secs is killing me...and would take WAY too long to get through it...I would love to be able to download it...any thoughts?

   Reply

6. Back to top

   Re: trying to watch

   Aug 4, 2007 8:39 PM by lee h

   thanks for the link!....though I still would love to see the full video

   Reply

7. Back to top

   Talk was incorrect regarding arrays of regexp objects in perl

   Aug 7, 2007 12:43 PM by Josh ben Jore

   Perl has had a regexp object since 5.6 was released in 2000. I don't know of any operating systems that still ship with an older version. The speaker should have done his homework on this before spending what seemed like five minutes larking about how this feature was lacking.
   
   We've had this seven years now. Please catch up.

   Reply

8. Back to top

   Don't talk about Perl if you don't know it

   Aug 14, 2007 4:42 PM by brian d foy

   Ruby is certainly a nice language and I like it. However, you shouldn't
   use your ignornace if Perl to support Ruby:
   
   * Perl sigils do not denote type: they denote context. $scalar is a
   scalar, but $array[0] works with an array, and $hash{foo} works with a
   hash. @array[0,1] works with an array, but @hash{'foo', 'bar'}. It's
   not type, what you're doing with it. You can read more about that in
   Learning Perl.
   
   * Perl regular expressions aren't operators: the match operator, m//, is an
   operator, but that's not the thing that's the pattern. The stuff
   inside the match operator is the pattern, but the pattern is not the
   match operator. You can create a regular expression without the match
   operator with the qr() quoting mechanism.
   
   You'll eventually find that Ruby, if it gets as popular as Perl, will be treated as poorly as Perl as newbies learn by hit-and-miss. Newbies will invent their own systems to explain the portions of Ruby that they know and that they think they understand. Just wait :)

   Reply

9. Back to top

   Ruby presentation

   Feb 7, 2008 1:21 PM by Jure http://blog.regulus.si

   Tnx!
   I really like to learn from these Ruby presentations since I am unable to be at the conferences for now.
   
   Jure
   www.scarlet-studio.net

   Reply

• Older >