InfoQ

InfoQ

News

My Bookmarks

Login or Register to enable bookmarks for unlimited time.

The content has been bookmarked!

There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.

Lisp on the .NET Runtime

Posted by Jonathan Allen on Oct 26, 2007

Sections
Development,
Architecture & Design
Topics
Interop ,
.NET
Tags
IronLisp ,
LISP ,
Common Lisp

Continuing our coverage of Lisp, we present some of the efforts underway to port the venerable language to the .NET runtime. Variants we look at include IronLisp, LispSharp, and Common Larceny.

IronLisp is new project loosely based on Scheme. It is being developed against the Dynamic Language Runtime, or DLR, an extension for the Common Language Runtime that adds features needed for dynamic languages like Python and Ruby. As the DLR is relatively new and very much in flux, this decision is an additional burden to the IronLisp team.

IronLisp is not currently Scheme compatible, but Llewellyn Pritchard writes:

Ideally IronLisp at some future time, will support/comply to some degree of Scheme, or will have a compatibility mode, or have macros to make it syntax (and functionally) compatible. With this in hand, hopefully IronLisp would be capable of running Scheme libraries.

Llewellyn Pritchard was inspired in part by Rob Blackwell's LSharp .NET. This lisp dialect is similar to Arc and is considered stable. An example of using Windows Presentation Foundation with LSharp is available.

Currently there is not much activity on the LSharp project and no mention of DLR or SilverLight support.

Another older project for the CLR is Common Larceny. Part of the Larceny Project, it is a Scheme implementation based on Twobit compiler. Though mired in the alpha stage, there is active work on the project with the last release in July. It explicitly states that it is not supported on Mono at this time.

With no production grade Lisp that is compatible with Common Lisp or Scheme, Lisp on the .NET platform does not seem to be a viable option at this time. Though the DLR may drive new interest over the coming year, for now it seems Lisp developers wanting access to the .NET framework should stick to compatibility layers like RDNZL.

No comments

Watch Thread Reply

Educational Content

New-age Transactional Systems - Not Your Grandpa's OLTP

John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.

Cool Code

Kevlin Henney examines code samples to see what can be learned from them starting from the premise that one won’t write great code unless he knows how to read it.

Collaboration: At the Extremities of Extreme

Jason Ayers share the observations he made watching a team of developers collaborating in real time on the same code base, pushing XP, pair programming and continuous integration to their extremes.

Yesod Web Framework

Michael Snoyman presents Yesod, a web framework written in Haskell and containing a web server, templating, ORM, libraries (templating, gravatar, etc.).

Transactions without Transactions

Richard Kreuter and Kyle Banker on how to avoid classical RDBMS transactional systems by using compensation mechanisms, transactional messaging or transactional procedures.

Attila Szegedi on JVM and GC Performance Tuning at Twitter

Attila Szegedi talks about performance tuning Java and Scala programs at Twitter: how to approach GC problems, the importance of asynchronous I/O, when to use MySQL/Cassandra/Redis, and much more.

10 tips on how to prevent business value risk

One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.

Interview: Software Systems Architecture: Working With Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives

InfoQ spoke to the authors of Software Systems Architecture on a couple of new topics, the System Context viewpoint and Agile, which have been added to the second edition.