Tapestry for Nonbelievers
A new article by I. Drobiazko and R. Zubairov introduces v. 5 of the Apache Tapestry component-oriented web framework. The tutorial shows how to create a component and covers IoC in Tapestry and Ajax.
Tracking change and innovation in the enterprise software development community
Posted by Floyd Marinescu,Thomas Bernhardt on Oct 12, 2007 08:40 AM
Esper (which version 1.0 was announced more than one year ago on InfoQ) is an event stream processing (ESP) and event correlation engine (CEP) that triggers actions when event conditions occurs among event streams - which can be thought of as a database turned upside down where statements are registered and data streams flow through. Event processing is a growing trend in the software industry, and several vendors have entered the market following a number of startups. Common use cases range from algorithmic trading, BAM, RFID, advanced monitoring systems and fraud detection up to a direct relationship with an SOA. InfoQ caught up with Thomas Bernhardt & Alexandre Vasseur on recent developments with the project.I think the fact that Esper plays a role in BEA's product helps the Esper project in a couple of ways. First, feedback gained is incorporated backWith the growth of this market space and the presence of multiple competing implementations, standardization could play some benefit. Thomas commented on the potential and background CEP language standardization:
into an improved Esper. Second, the BEA product raises overall awareness of CEP/ESP technology hugely and thus enlargens the mindshare and market.
Third, its a great testimony to how open, extensible, and enterprise grade ready Esper technology is. The Esper community and users base is really proud of that relationship.
The CEP community clearly sees CEP and ESP as complimentary, and recognizes that other approaches (i.e. baynesian or neural networks) also apply to CEP problems. In light of various approaches, and vendors not agreeing, the most relevant standard appears to emerge from work of the ANSI SQL standardization commitee extending SQL to provide "pattern matching in sequence of rows".Perhaps the most notable news related to Esper recently is the publishing of a performance benchmark kit and results, in mid-august:
There will for sure be further work on that early topic and standardization will likely go beyond ESP/CEP language standardization.
Esper exceeds over 500 000 event/s on a dual CPU 2GHz Intel based hardware, with engine latency below 3 microseconds average (below 10us with more than 99% predictability) on a VWAP benchmark with 1000 statements registered in the system - this tops at 70 Mbit/s at 85% CPU usage.Despite based on a rather simple use case, the publication of this benchmark work is aimed at shaking the industry, as it comes with a complete kit to replay the benchmark. An Esper event server is listening to remote clients sending market stock events over the network. The Esper engine is configured to compute volume weighted moving average of the feeds in real time over a sliding window of time or events.
The CEP market has been common place of vague information regarding performance and latency with every vendor throwing its figures in the press without any details at all. No comparative benchmarks exists in this area yet.The Esper team has also published the details of all its runs on its wiki and updated its product website with a performance section and performance best practices section. Another source of benchmarks may be coming from the newly formed STAC benchmark council, which aims to put out customer-driven benchmark standards for trading technology.
Vague performance information in this industry had already been criticized by Progress Apama and others . Here is a compilation from the Apama blog:* Skyler manages rates as high as 200,000 messages/second * Key feature: Coral8 handles thousands to millions of events per second * StreamBase extends performance leadership by processing over one million events per second with near zero latency * Aleri Labs breaks sub-millisecond latency barrierApama itself claims to be "a high-performance, scalable processing engine that can process thousands of events per second". Such claims could also be found in the BEA wording regarding their WebLogic Event Server announcement with inferior yet more precise figures: "As we come out of the gate, we're going to provide 50,000 complex events per second".
Those results seems to confirm that "hundreds of thousands" events per second is common and no exceptional in this area, and also show exactly how Esper performs on the given scenarios. It also gives valuable material to the user community to better assess performance instead of listening to random vendor FUD commonly throwned at disruptive yet affordable open source software.
Scale your applications without punishing your database
Evaluation Guide: Is Your SCM Tool Ready for Agile?
Delivering a Breakthrough Java Computing Experience
A Technical Introduction to Terracotta
Info 2.0: IBM's vision for the world of Web 2.0 and enterprise mashups (Webcast)
No comparison to kdb+ here, which is pretty quick - and has been applying vector processing to stock prices (among other things) for ages. e.g. select amount wavg price by date from trade where stock=`BT.L check out www.kdb.com/q for more info. i have no connection with kdb or 1st derivatives.
I believe Kdb+ (at kx.com by the way) is primarily a time series database. As such it does not have features for causality ("happened before" relation between events), and I expect it to be pretty hard to deal with "absence of events". By contrast Esper features both event stream (dealing with sliding windows of real time data stream) and complex events (happened before and other time guard constructs). The vwap benchmark that illustrates Esper performance is certainly a simple enough use case to compare Esper with a time series database, but it is far from giving a complete overview of what can be achieved with Esper event processing and continuous queries capabilities. This said kdb+ is an interesting piece of software and I believe this should be fairly possible to integrate Esper with KX kdb+ for f.e. event replay capabilities. Alex
unrelated to the kdb+ question above - i had a cause to use esper recently to measure application performance. On a current SOA project i was able to determine application latency and throughput by matching the correlation-ids being output by the various systems. adding a performance monitor with esper took about three hours from concept to finished implementation. good job guys.
sorry i forgot to mention - it required not a single application change.
havalandırma havalandirma izolasyon Sohbet iso 9001 iso 14001 Yangın Söndürme yangın söndürme cihazları yangın dolapları yangın tüpü izalasyon ısıtma soğutma isitma sogutma Aspirator Aspiratör Vantilatör sohbetim turizm işletme belgesi turizm belgesi turizm yatırım belgesi Chat sohbet odası sohbet sitesi türkiye sohbet tr sohbet tüm türkiye sohbet arkadaş sohbet türkiye sohpet kızlarla sohbet kızlarla sohpet muhabbet muhappet kızlarla çet çet türkiye çet çet sohpet mırç mirç türkiye mirc mirc muhabbet Sohbet Sitesi Chat Sohpet Yangın yangın güvenlik yangın söndürme sistemleri yangın tüpü dolum yangın merdiveni yangın çıkış kapısı Hava Soğutma Hücreli Aspiratörler Fanlar Radyal Körükler Toz Toplama Soğutma Kulesi Klima Santraller Malzeme Nakil Vantilatörleri iso 14001 iso 14001 iso 22000 iso 22000 haccp belgesi haccp belgesi ikamet tezkeresi yabancı çalışma izni yabancı personel çalışma izni yabancı çalışma izni yabancı personel çalışma izni ohsas 18001 ohsas 18001 iso belgesi iso 9001 belgesi ohsas belgesi ISO 9001 Teşvik Belgesi Çocuk Bezi Hasta Bezi Makyaj Malzemeleri Makyaj Temizleme Mendili Kişisel Bakım kolonyalı mendil Islak mendil Dudak Koruyucu Temizlik Ürünleri Göz Kalemi Diyet Ürünleri Süper Site driver Güvenlik Kamerası Islak Mendil Kolonyalı Mendil Kolonyalı Mendil JoyTurk driver ara web tasarım Güvenlik Kamerası paketleme Kamera gizli kamera Kamera Kurulum Tatil Tatil Yerleri Tatil Beldeleri Perde Perde Modelleri Kamera Epilasyon Emlak Yaşam Tatil Video Cilt Bakımı video süper perde jaluzi perde stor perde dikey perde perde modelleri perde jaluzi perde stor perde dikey perde perde modelleri magazin haberler spor haberleri video eğitim Giyim
A new article by I. Drobiazko and R. Zubairov introduces v. 5 of the Apache Tapestry component-oriented web framework. The tutorial shows how to create a component and covers IoC in Tapestry and Ajax.
In this interview, Burton Group consultant Pete Lacey talks to Stefan Tilkov about his disillusionment with SOAP, his opinion on REST, and addresses some of the perceived shortcomings REST vs. WS-*.
Jay Fields presents his concept of Business Natural Languages - a type of Domain Specific Languages geared towards being readable by domain experts.
Adoption and interest for Distributed Version Control Systems is constantly rising. We will introduce the concept of DVCS and have a look at 3 actors in the area: git, Mercurial and Bazaar.
Deborah Hartmann interviewed Segundo Velasquez about his experience as customer with an Agile team during the initial phase of software design of a product.
David Cooksey shows how to fine grained versioning to a ClickOnce deployment using an HttpHandler written with ASP.NET, making partial rollouts to a test audience much easier.
Windows workflow (WF) is an excellent framework for implementing business processes, but lacks support for human activities. This article describes a completely generic approach for changing this.
In this interview taken during OOPSLA 2007, Markus Voelter talks about the importance of documenting the software architecture, and gives some good and also bad examples on how it could be done.
5 comments
Reply