InfoQ

News

MinWin Core: 25MB on Disk and 100 Files

Posted by James Vastbinder on Oct 26, 2007 12:00 AM

Community
.NET
Topics
Operating Systems
Tags
Windows7,
Windows,
Microsoft

On October 13th at the University of Illinois Eric Traut first showed a version of Windows code-named Windows 7.  In the demonstration Eric allocated 40MB of RAM to the virtual machine and ran the stripped down operating system with 10 active processes taking up only about 33MB of RAM.   

The actual kernel of the new Windows version is claimed to be about 4MB in size.  Further reductions included for a minimal install:

  • 100 Files
  • 25MB in disk utilization
  • no graphical user interface
  • minimal http server
  • boot time of less than 20 seconds

When looking at statistics like this, speculation is rampant.  A common theory is that Microsoft is returning a single code base, but no official announcement has been made to date.  At present Microsoft maintains several versions of Windows with separate kernels:

  • Windows Server 2008 / Windows Vista
  • Windows Server 2003 / R2 / XP / XPe
  • Windows Server 2000
  • WinCE 4.x / PPC OS / Smartphone OS
  • WinCE 5 / Windows Mobile 5
  • WinCE 6 / Windows Mobile 6

A return to a single kernel code base would seem to be a logical next step.  Especially given the work being done in the Server and Tools division on the Phoenix project and a move to a single code generation platform. 

What do InfoQ readers think?

7 comments

Reply

funny counting by Stefan Wenig Posted Oct 26, 2007 6:01 AM
Re: funny counting by Jim Leonardo Posted Oct 26, 2007 5:13 PM
Re: funny counting by James Vastbinder Posted Nov 2, 2007 10:38 AM
Academic, but Interesting by Geoffrey Wiseman Posted Oct 26, 2007 2:17 PM
micro devices? by Erik Bengtson Posted Oct 27, 2007 5:11 AM
Re: micro devices? by James Vastbinder Posted Nov 2, 2007 10:40 AM
Re: micro devices? by Rudi Larno Posted Nov 14, 2007 6:29 AM
  1. Back to top

    funny counting

    Oct 26, 2007 6:01 AM by Stefan Wenig

    if you count each released version of the same codebase, minwin is just going to increase the number of kernels ;-)

  2. Back to top

    Academic, but Interesting

    Oct 26, 2007 2:17 PM by Geoffrey Wiseman

    While this is certainly interesting, it's interesting in an academic way. Hard to say if this is just the next 'WinFS', fun to talk about, but ultimately unrelated to what gets released. (Besides, we've see Microsoft try the single codebase thing before; they keep oscillating)

  3. Back to top

    Re: funny counting

    Oct 26, 2007 5:13 PM by Jim Leonardo

    It sounds like that's the idea... the beyond vista windows. My question is: does this mean that Vista is ultimately destined for the same trash heap as WindowsME and MS-Bob? Or is it more of a Windows95 to Windows98 analogy? (i.e. run out vista to get the new thingy out there, make it stable and performant in the followup). The other REALLY interesting bit is the code name. Since when do you "Code name" as product name/version? And there's the oxymoron... no UI, but lets call it windows? What I want to know is why does James mixup versions and codebase in his article? Single code base would apply to a generation across server and desktop (such as a single code base for XP and Server 2k3), not across generations (i.e. Server 2000 and Server 2k8). Jim

  4. Back to top

    micro devices?

    Oct 27, 2007 5:11 AM by Erik Bengtson

    is that a signal of massive deployment of windows in micro devices ? take care java

  5. Back to top

    Re: funny counting

    Nov 2, 2007 10:38 AM by James Vastbinder

    Jim - I don't think Vista is headed in that direction. I don't have much insight and am providing my own prognostication here. I think the teams are looking to consolidate engineering efforts at the OS level, but I haven't been able to verify as the teams are not speaking to the public yet. Eric's demo is their first communication. I was concentrating on the recent common theme to reduce competition among internal development teams in similiar solution sets. Recent MSFT examples would be WCF, Workflow Foundation, MS CRM, and Phoenix. -james

  6. Back to top

    Re: micro devices?

    Nov 2, 2007 10:40 AM by James Vastbinder

    Silverlight is an example of micro .NET. It's multi-platform and small compared to today's standards.... I don't see .NET as being ready as an OS at the micro device level at this time...

  7. Back to top

    Re: micro devices?

    Nov 14, 2007 6:29 AM by Rudi Larno

    Well, then you should check out the .NET Mircro Framework (http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/embedded/bb267253.aspx). It has no need for an OS, and can just launch your .NET (C#) code. It can be as small as 250K (with minimal CLR libraries). I no longer have a handle on how Java/Linux/etc. scales from chip to server farms, but Microsoft giving us developers the opportunity of writing in the same language, using the same tools, heck given some proper factoring of code, even running the same code on either a chip or a multi-core, multi-cpu, multi-server environment, is pretty cool. (hmmm, write once, run everywhere, where did I hear that slogan again?) On the other topic, I know Microsoft attempted to get back to a single codebase during the Longhorn development, and they failed, having to move back to the Windows XP SP2 codebase. So a good number of core changes were cut. One of which was the rework to be done on the I/O subsystem, Windows is just to dependant on the disk, and it's the disk that ultimately makes Windows slow over time.

Exclusive Content

Rob Windsor on WCF with REST, JSON and RSS

WCF is not just for SOAP based services and can be used with popular protocols like RSS, REST and JSON. Join Rob Windsor as he introduces WCF 3.5 and its new native support for non-SOAP services.

Christophe Coenraets Discusses Flex 3, AIR, and BlazeDS

Christophe Coenraets discusses Flex 3, Flex Builder, AIR, BlazeDS, Adobe and open source, integrating Flex with existing applications, and integrating RIAs with search engines and browsers.

Debunking Common Refactoring Misconceptions

Danijel Arsenovski attempts to dispel some of the myths around refactoring and how it applies to .NET developers.

REST Eye for the SOA Guy

In this presentation, recorded at QCon San Francisco, CORBA guru Steve Vinoski explains REST from the view of someone who comes to SOA from a traditional, RPC-oriented background.

Choose Feature Teams over Component Teams for Agility

Feature teams are key to scaling agility for large teams. In an excerpt from "Scaling Lean and Agile Development," Larman & Vodde show how feature teams resolve traditional problems & raise new issues

Billy Newport explains Virtualization

Billy Newport talks about virtualization, eXtreme Transaction Processing (XTP) and WebSphere Virtual Enterprise. He discusses hardware, hypervisor, JVM, application and data virtualization.

Virtualization and Security

While virtualization provides many benefits, security can not be a forgotten concept in its application.

Introduction to Agile for Traditional Project Managers

This session is specifically aimed at traditionally trained project managers who are new to Agile, and who would like to be able to relate the PMI's best practices to their Agile equivalents.