InfoQ

News

Interview: MLB.com on Their Use of Silverlight

Posted by James Vastbinder on Feb 27, 2008

Community
.NET
Topics
Java plus .NET Integration ,
Javascript ,
Silverlight ,
Rich Internet Apps
Tags
Flash ,
Casestudy

Henry Belmont and Thaniya Keereepart are part of the driving force behind MLB.com for Major League Baseball. Last year they relaunched the site and one of the marquee additions was the ability to watch the games in a Silverlight media player. 

They began working with Silverlight and the Microsoft product team when the technology was in its early alpha release stage.  However, with the website’s back-end written in Java and much of the user interface built with JSP, MLB.com is not your typical candidate for adopting Microsoft’s newest technology for building Rich Internet Apps. 

Learn why they made the decision to choose Silverlight and gain insight from their successful implmentation.

Re: why they went with silverlight by Branden Root Posted Feb 27, 2008 4:21 PM
Re: why they went with silverlight by Beverly White Posted Feb 28, 2008 11:07 AM
Re: why they went with silverlight by Danny Douglass Posted Mar 2, 2008 8:27 AM
Re: why they went with silverlight by mlb.com doesn't work very well Posted Apr 8, 2008 3:30 AM
MLB.TV Demo by Danny Douglass Posted Mar 2, 2008 8:18 AM
  1. Back to top

    Re: why they went with silverlight

    Feb 27, 2008 4:21 PM by Branden Root

    Because Microsoft offered them a giant buttload of money/free support for using an untested, alpha product over something 99% of the rest of the world uses (Flash).

  2. Back to top

    Re: why they went with silverlight

    Feb 28, 2008 11:07 AM by Beverly White

    Oh brother...lets see...you are saying that 1.You didn't read the interview 2. We should always use what we already have and what is "proven" even if something new comes along that looks attractive and helps us do more of what we want to do 3.That getting support (unless you pay a [butt load is it?] of money yourself) is bad. and 4.Do what others are doing (your Mom had to give you the standard line on that one...when are you jumping off the cliff?).

    Does this mean you will not be using the NEW Adobe tools for rich Internet apps? or you won't be developing anything that hasn't already been done before? I suspect you don't need to worry about that...no one will hire, or keep you for very long, if you are someone who refuses to move on. Change is scary...isn't it? You might have to learn something.

  3. Back to top

    MLB.TV Demo

    Mar 2, 2008 8:18 AM by Danny Douglass

    I saw your link on DotNetKicks and took a look at the video. I would like to write a blog post promoting the interview, but first wanted to experience the media player on MLB.TV. The Demo for the player is not working properly. Any chance you could offer a different link so I can grab a few screenshots?

    Thanks!

  4. Back to top

    Re: why they went with silverlight

    Mar 2, 2008 8:27 AM by Danny Douglass

    If I had to put money on it I would say that Branden works for a government organization. =]

    No offense meant Branden, but I think Beverly made some good points. Silverlight does have an uphill battle against Flash for widespread implementation. However it is a very powerful and rich tool that should not be dismissed simply because it is new. Personally, I am really looking forward to working with the Silverlight 2.0 beta!

  5. Back to top

    Re: why they went with silverlight

    Apr 8, 2008 3:30 AM by mlb.com doesn't work very well

    Don't be so smug Bev. MLB.com is too big of an outfit to be charging me $20 a month to deliver a product that doesn't work. My machine is rather new with a 7mb connection and I still can't get a decent picture with Silverlight. I don't want to be a beta tester for Microsoft, I just want to watch baseball. For my money, stick with the tried and true until all the bugs get worked out.

Educational Content

Brian Marick on 4 Challenges and 5 Guiding Values of Agile Software Development

Brian Marick takes us through a quick tour of the most important values and challenges to adopting Agile successfully (they aren't the typical challenges and values we hear in the community).

Are You a Software Architect?

The line between development and architecture is tricky. Does it exist at all? Is an ivory tower actually needed? There's a balance in the middle, but how do you move from developer to architect?

Agile – A Way of Life and Pragmatic Use of Authority

The word 'authority' sometimes produces an allergic response in hard-line agilists. Freedom and authority – both are bad if misused and both are good if used in right spirit for a noble cause.

Getting Started with Grails, Second Edition

"Getting Started with Grails" brings you up to speed on this modern web framework. Companies as varied as LinkedIn, Wired, and Taco Bell are all using Grails. Are you ready to get started as well?

Using ITIL V3 as a Foundation for SOA Governance

Those familiar with only ITIL V2 often scoff at the thought that ITIL could serve as a governance framework for SOA. With ITIL V3, the focus of the framework shifted towards service-orientation.

Adrian Colyer on AspectJ, tc Server and dm Server

SpringSource CTO Adrian Colyer discusses AspectJ, SpringSource's dm Server and tc Server products, OSGi and Scrum.

Adam Wiggins on Heroku

Heroku's Adam Wiggins talks about Rails, Background Jobs, Add-Ons, Ruby, and how Heroku manages to work around Ruby's inefficiencies using Erlang and other languages.

SOA as an Architectural Pattern: Best Practices in Software Architecture

For Grady Booch the foundation of a good architecture is patterns, SOA being just one of many patterns. In this Second Life presentation, Booch attempts to bring more clarity on what architecture is.