10 tips on how to prevent business value risk
One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.
The content has been bookmarked!
There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.
Posted by Werner Schuster on Feb 26, 2008
Object.tap method, which adds a convenient way of spying on chained method calls. tap method, the idea for the to_proc has been known in the Ruby community for some time - the feature is also available for pre-1.9 Ruby versions. Ruby 1.9 simply integrates this into the class Symbol, making the behavior available without any supporting libraries. to_proc makes code like (1..100).inject(&:+) work: The & operator converts Proc objects into blocks and block into Proc objects. In this case, it tries to convert the symbol :+ into a block. The conversion uses Ruby's built-in coercion mechanism. That mechanism checks to see whether we have a Proc object. If not, it sends the #to_proc method to the argument to make a Proc. If the Symbol :+ has a #to_proc method, it will be called. In Ruby 1.9 it has a #to_proc method. That method returns a Proc that takes its first argument and sends the + method to it along with any other arguments that may be present.This beheavior can be seen with code like this.:
So,&:+really means{ |x, y| x + y }.
plus = :+.to_procSince the class
puts plus.call(1,2) # prints '3'
Symbol has the to_proc method, this approach works for every symbol:to_s = :to_s.to_proc
to_s.call(42) # results in the string "42"
to_proc is simple. Dave Thomas (PragDave) shows how it works:
def to_proc
proc { |obj, *args| obj.send(self, *args) }
end
It creates a Proc which, when called on an object, sends that object the symbol itself. So, when names.map(&:upcase) starts to iterate over the strings in names, it'll call the block, passing in the first name and invoking its upcase method.
to_proc to standard Ruby 1.9, simply because the Symbol now always comes with to_proc.Symbol and added it. Also: understanding the code involved knowledge of the general Symbol#to_proc idiom, which in Ruby 1.9 has been officially added, and is now more likely to be mentioned in documentation. (1..100).map(&:to_s)Vs.
(1..100).map{|x| x.to_s }
Saving five characters (for this example) - is it worth the extra complexity or not? Proc#curry. A recent ruby-core discussion shows what Proc#curry does:
It's not difficult at all,
proc {|x, y, z| x + y + z }.curry
returns the proc object equivalent to
proc {|x| proc {|y| proc {|z| x + y + z } } }
[..] is the technique of transforming a function that takes multiple arguments into a function that takes a single argument (the other arguments having been specified by the curry).In other words: using currying, a Proc that takes
x arguments, can be called with a single argument. Since, obviously, it can't return the result of it's code - it's missing arguments required to run the code - it returns a new Proc that takes (x - 1) arguments. Once this has been repeated enough times so the resulting Proc has all the arguments it needs, the code is evaluated and the result returned. plus_five = proc { |x,y,z| x + y + z }.curry.call(2).call(3)
plus_five[10] #=> 15
Note: plus_five is a Proc - the [] operator for Proc is overloaded to invoke the Proc. Proc#curry is a very recent addition to Ruby 1.9 - to try it, you'll have to use a recent revision.Complimentary Gartner (Hype Cycle for Cloud Security Report)
Agile Maturity Model Applied to Building and Releasing Software
Agile Practices to Improve Project Management Organization (PMO) Effectiveness
Monitor your Production Java App - includes JMX! Low Overhead - Free download
One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.
InfoQ spoke to the authors of Software Systems Architecture on a couple of new topics, the System Context viewpoint and Agile, which have been added to the second edition.
Alex Papadimoulis discusses ugly code, where it comes from, how to avoid it, and how to get rid of it.
John Davies examines Visa’s architecture and shows how enterprises have architected complex integrations incorporating Hadoop, memcached, Ruby on Rails, and others to deliver innovative solutions.
Sean Comerford unveils ESPN.com’s architecture, what components are used and why, and the current changes the website goes through.
Are there repeated patterns of failure on Enterprise Agile Enablement efforts? Sanjiv and Arlen discuss Seven Deadly Sins to avoid when adopting Agile in an enterprise.
Erik Dörnenburg answers: What is Enterprise and Evolutionary Architecture?, discussing 4 issues: Turning strategy into execution, Ensuring conformance, Where do the architects sit? Buying or building?
Sean Cribbs explains what Map-Reduce and Riak are, why and how to use Map-Reduce with Riak, and how to convert SQL queries into their Map-Reduce equivalents.
No comments
Watch Thread Reply