Collection Initializers in VB
Collection initializers were supposed to be released along with LINQ in C# 3 and VB 9. While C# did get them, they were cut from the VB release. Part of the reason was the Visual Basic team wanted to make VB's version more powerful.
In C#, collection initializers are limited to explicitly known types. For VB, Microsoft wants to also support inferred types. This would allow developers to write statements such as:
Dim x = {1, 2, 3, 4}
Dim y = {{"a", 1}, {"b", 2}, {"c", 3}, {"d", 4}}
Dim z = {{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}, {7, 8}}
There is, however, some debate on exactly what this syntax should mean. Some argue that in all cases it should return arrays, while others want to see lists and dictionaries. Part of this stems from the fact that VB does not have a clean syntax for quickly defining tuples. Tuples are increasing becoming important as we move towards more functional programming and dynamic typing.
Anthony Green brings up the issue of jagged vs. rectangular arrays. In our example, variable z could be either Integer(,) or Integer()() (C# int[,] and int[][]).
Bill McCarthy suggestion for one-dimensional collections seems to be popular:
Dim x = {1, 2, 3, 4} 'List(Of Int32)
Dim x() = {1, 2, 3, 4} 'array of Int32
And to handle dictionaries, Ninputer offers this approach:
Dim d = {1:"Hello", 2:"World" }
You can follow the debate on Paul Vick's blog.
Educational Content
Concurrency in Clojure
Stuart Halloway May 17, 2013
Confessions of an Agile Addict
Ole Friis Østergaard May 16, 2013
Web Development: You're Doing It Wrong
Stefan Tilkov May 16, 2013
Programming The Feynman Way
Ben Evans May 15, 2013





Hello stranger!
You need to Register an InfoQ account or Login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.
Tell us what you think