InfoQ

InfoQ

News

My Bookmarks

Login or Register to enable bookmarks for unlimited time.

The content has been bookmarked!

There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.

Oracle's Cameron Purdy Looks at 10 Patterns for Scaling Out

Posted by Scott Delap on May 28, 2008

Sections
Development,
Architecture & Design
Topics
Architecture ,
Performance & Scalability ,
Java
Tags
Java EE
Oracle's Cameron Purdy recently presented on the topic of scalability at JavaOne 2008. The talk did not focus on specific Java libraries as do many talks at JavaOne. Instead general principles of architecture and design were reviewed from a pragmatic common sense angle. In general Purdy broke the problem down into 10 steps:

10 - Understanding the Problem
9 - Define the Requirements
8 - Architecture Trumps Technology
7 - Understand the Basics
6 - Visualize the Networks
5 - Visualize the Design
4a - Plan for Overload
4b - Partition for Scalability
3a - Plan for Failure
3b - Replicate for Availability
2 - Tier Where It Makes Sense
1 - Simplify
It was noted that scalability does not speed up an application. A scalable system will always be slower than a single user system. Give the recent debate over Twitter's scalability using Ruby it was also interesting to see the point that "Architecture trumps technology". He comically noted that "even Windows could be scaled". Purdy did say that legitimate technology concerns could include unpredictable scheduling of GC, lack of control over thread scheduling, and lack of asynchronous I/O.

Purdy went on to state that the challenge of creating a scalable stateful system is to achieve availability, reliability, scalability, and performance while having a system that is manageable and serviceable. At this point the presentation focused on the five patterns of stateful scale-out:

  • Routing
  • Partitioning
  • Replication (Availability)
  • Coordination
  • Messaging
Reliable routing was described as the the fundamental enabler of stateful scale-out providing support for partitioning and replication.  The final and most important topic covered was simplification. Purdy noted that complexity is the enemy of reliability. Complex systems should be able to be modeled as finite state architectures. "if you can't show it working on a white board, you can be certain it won't work on production".

No comments

Watch Thread Reply

Educational Content

10 tips on how to prevent business value risk

One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.

Interview: Software Systems Architecture: Working With Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives

InfoQ spoke to the authors of Software Systems Architecture on a couple of new topics, the System Context viewpoint and Agile, which have been added to the second edition.

Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder

Alex Papadimoulis discusses ugly code, where it comes from, how to avoid it, and how to get rid of it.

Architecting Visa for Massive Scale and Continuous Innovation

John Davies examines Visa’s architecture and shows how enterprises have architected complex integrations incorporating Hadoop, memcached, Ruby on Rails, and others to deliver innovative solutions.

Max Protect: Scalability and Caching at ESPN.com

Sean Comerford unveils ESPN.com’s architecture, what components are used and why, and the current changes the website goes through.

The Seven Deadly Sins of Enterprise Agile Adoption

Are there repeated patterns of failure on Enterprise Agile Enablement efforts? Sanjiv and Arlen discuss Seven Deadly Sins to avoid when adopting Agile in an enterprise.

Questions for an Enterprise Architect

Erik Dörnenburg answers: What is Enterprise and Evolutionary Architecture?, discussing 4 issues: Turning strategy into execution, Ensuring conformance, Where do the architects sit? Buying or building?

Wrap Your SQL Head Around Riak MapReduce

Sean Cribbs explains what Map-Reduce and Riak are, why and how to use Map-Reduce with Riak, and how to convert SQL queries into their Map-Reduce equivalents.