InfoQ

InfoQ

News

My Bookmarks

Login or Register to enable bookmarks for unlimited time.

The content has been bookmarked!

There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.

RedHat Shifts Virtualization Strategy from Xen to KVM

Posted by Scott Delap on Jun 24, 2008

Sections
Development,
Operations & Infrastructure
Topics
Java ,
Virtualization
Tags
RedHat
Last week at the Red Hat Summit, Red Hat announced a new hypervisor based on KVM:

Embedded Linux Hypervisor — a lightweight, embeddable hypervisor for hosting virtualized Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Microsoft® Windows® environments. This hypervisor delivers virtualization with all the advantages of Linux - superior security, high performance and a wide range of hardware support - all in a small footprint that is easily embedded into servers and desktop computers. Red Hat is announcing beta availability of this hypervisor at www.ovirt.org. The hypervisor is based on the KVM project (kvm.qumranet.com), which has been integrated into the Linux kernel since 2006. It supports live migration of virtual machines from system to system in real time and high availability features. KVM technology has rapidly emerged as the next-generation virtualization technology, following on from the highly successful Xen implementation.

It was also noted in the press release that IBM cooperated on the effort:

"IBM works closely with Red Hat and the open source community to drive innovation within the Linux kernel, said Daniel Frye, vice president, open systems development at IBM. IBM has a heterogenous approach toward virtualization, with KVM one of several options. KVM leverages the core features of the Linux kernel, including paravirtualization interfaces contributed by IBM engineers. By combining Linux virtualization infrastructure with open management interfaces such as CIM and libvirt, we gain a solution that eliminates lock-in and breaks down the barriers to enterprise wide adoption of virtualization.""

This announcement is particularly interesting given Red Hat's previous support of the Xen hypervisor. Virtualization.info notes how Red Hat has lost influence in the project in the recent year:

...a series of dramatic events happened. First Microsoft signed a series of alliances with the some of the key Xen contributors: with XenSource, with Novell and with Virtual Iron. Then Citrix acquired XenSource in August 2007.

So, in less than one year Red Hat lost much of its capability to influence the Xen development despite it contributes to the open source project since the early beginning...

Former Red Hat VP of North American Sales, Billy Marshall, also notes the continued movement of traditional OS vendors to claim virtualization as a feature as an attempt to hold off bare metal hypervisors.

No comments

Watch Thread Reply

Educational Content

New-age Transactional Systems - Not Your Grandpa's OLTP

John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.

Cool Code

Kevlin Henney examines code samples to see what can be learned from them starting from the premise that one won’t write great code unless he knows how to read it.

Collaboration: At the Extremities of Extreme

Jason Ayers share the observations he made watching a team of developers collaborating in real time on the same code base, pushing XP, pair programming and continuous integration to their extremes.

Yesod Web Framework

Michael Snoyman presents Yesod, a web framework written in Haskell and containing a web server, templating, ORM, libraries (templating, gravatar, etc.).

Transactions without Transactions

Richard Kreuter and Kyle Banker on how to avoid classical RDBMS transactional systems by using compensation mechanisms, transactional messaging or transactional procedures.

Attila Szegedi on JVM and GC Performance Tuning at Twitter

Attila Szegedi talks about performance tuning Java and Scala programs at Twitter: how to approach GC problems, the importance of asynchronous I/O, when to use MySQL/Cassandra/Redis, and much more.

10 tips on how to prevent business value risk

One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.

Interview: Software Systems Architecture: Working With Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives

InfoQ spoke to the authors of Software Systems Architecture on a couple of new topics, the System Context viewpoint and Agile, which have been added to the second edition.