Jesper Boeg on Priming Kanban
In this interview, Jesper Boeg, author of the new InfoQ book – Priming Kanban, discusses the keys to using Kanban effectively, and how to get started if you are currently using other approaches.
The content has been bookmarked!
There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.
Posted by Abel Avram on Oct 09, 2008
.NET 3.5 SP1 was released in August and, theoretically, it should not break applications based on previous versions of the CLR, respectively 2.0, 3.0, 3.5. But there are reports that some applications are broken including the open source project Castle.
Scott Hanselman, a Senior Program Manager at Microsoft, wrote on issues existing with .NET 3.5 SP1. First, he asked: "Will the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 break my 2.0 apps?", then he answered "Almost certainly not.". After explaining why 3.5 SP1 should not affect existing .NET applications, based on CLR 2.0 and later, he admits he has "hit an edge case". He advises on doing in-house testing to make sure the SP1 won't break anything:
It IS possible that something could break, so as with all SP’s you should do compatibility testing to make sure you’re not hitting an edge case.
Castle Project founder, Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira, who has joined Microsoft this year, has complained about SP1 breaking Castle. He explains what is broken and what they did to work around it:
Hamilton recommends:
If some team on CLR decided to run Castle tests cases with SP1, they would have detected that. Mono does aggregate external tests cases repositories to test their platform implementation. MS could do the same for a handful of OSS projects, where license is not a problem. If that’s not possible due to legal issues, the CLR team can streamline the communication with OSS teams and get early feedback.
Scott Hanselman promises there will be a patch to .NET 3.5 SP1 before SP1 will be rolled out through Windows Update, some time in November. When that happens, all machines currently with .NET 2.0 will be upgraded to 3.5 SP1. In the meantime, those who are having problems with .NET 3.5 SP1 are encouraged to post the bugs on Microsoft's Connect site.
Using Drools? See what you're missing! Get the Power of Drools with the Assurance of Red Hat
A practical guide to choosing the right agile tools
agility@scale eKit: 10 Principles, Scaling Model, Metrics, Collaboration
It is also the case that if the Castle people had tested their code with the beta of SP1, then we would not be having this conversation. The beta was out there for three months!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but CLR in .NET 3.x is still 2.0.
- Does 3.5 sp1 also patch my .NET 2.0 *framework*?
- Is there a single version of CLR on a machine?
- If not, is there a way to specify the CLR version to use?
In this interview, Jesper Boeg, author of the new InfoQ book – Priming Kanban, discusses the keys to using Kanban effectively, and how to get started if you are currently using other approaches.
John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.
Kevlin Henney examines code samples to see what can be learned from them starting from the premise that one won’t write great code unless he knows how to read it.
Jason Ayers share the observations he made watching a team of developers collaborating in real time on the same code base, pushing XP, pair programming and continuous integration to their extremes.
Michael Snoyman presents Yesod, a web framework written in Haskell and containing a web server, templating, ORM, libraries (templating, gravatar, etc.).
Richard Kreuter and Kyle Banker on how to avoid classical RDBMS transactional systems by using compensation mechanisms, transactional messaging or transactional procedures.
Attila Szegedi talks about performance tuning Java and Scala programs at Twitter: how to approach GC problems, the importance of asynchronous I/O, when to use MySQL/Cassandra/Redis, and much more.
One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.
2 comments
Watch Thread Reply