InfoQ

InfoQ

News

My Bookmarks

Login or Register to enable bookmarks for unlimited time.

The content has been bookmarked!

There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.

Are IBM’s Cloud Computing Consulting Services Generating a Conflict of Interests?

Posted by Abel Avram on Nov 28, 2008

Sections
Architecture & Design,
Operations & Infrastructure
Topics
Architecture ,
Cloud Computing

In an attempt to capitalize on the cloud computing hype, IBM announced the launch of a new set of consulting services aimed at businesses which want to use this computing model. It is likely this move will affect IBM’s core enterprise consulting services.

Aimed at public, private or hybrid businesses, IBM offers three types of services:

  • Industry-specific Business Consulting Services for Cloud Computing - IBM Global Business Services will use an economic model for assessing the total cost of ownership for building private clouds, and/or moving data and applications off-site in a public or hybrid cloud model.
  • Technology Consulting, Design and Implementation Services - IBM Global Technology Services is announcing new services to help clients install, configure and deliver cloud computing inside the data center.
  • Cloud Security - Spanning IBM Systems, Software, Services and IBM's lauded Research and X-Force arms, this effort is aimed at re-architecting and re-designing technologies and processes, to infuse security and shield against threats and vulnerabilities in the cloud.

In a recent podcast, David Linthicum, an enterprise architecture consultant, speaks about a conflict of interests generated by IBM’s move:

I cannot help seeing the underline issue here: the more successful they are in moving their clients to cloud computing, the less the enterprise data center is needed. This results in reducing sales in enterprise hardware and software vendors, specifically for, you know, IBM.

IBM’s successful cloud computing efforts will result in hurting the other side of the business.

Dave also notes the same issue with Microsoft:

Microsoft is in the same boat with the appearance of Azure, their new cloud computing platform. They are replacing any of the Microsoft driven servers with clouds.

Perhaps this is a realization of the fact that cloud computing is coming, or it is the result of the need to control the clouds as much as you can.

Dave comments the reasons behind IBM’s jump into the bandwagon:

IBM sees cloud computing coming no matter what they do. They are looking to capitalize on the movement and perhaps find something that’s growing in a world when IT budgets are shrinking.

It seems obvious that IBM’s move into cloud computing consulting services will have impact on their base enterprise services. The question is: how much their core business will be affected by the move?

No comments

Watch Thread Reply

Educational Content

New-age Transactional Systems - Not Your Grandpa's OLTP

John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.

Cool Code

Kevlin Henney examines code samples to see what can be learned from them starting from the premise that one won’t write great code unless he knows how to read it.

Collaboration: At the Extremities of Extreme

Jason Ayers share the observations he made watching a team of developers collaborating in real time on the same code base, pushing XP, pair programming and continuous integration to their extremes.

Yesod Web Framework

Michael Snoyman presents Yesod, a web framework written in Haskell and containing a web server, templating, ORM, libraries (templating, gravatar, etc.).

Transactions without Transactions

Richard Kreuter and Kyle Banker on how to avoid classical RDBMS transactional systems by using compensation mechanisms, transactional messaging or transactional procedures.

Attila Szegedi on JVM and GC Performance Tuning at Twitter

Attila Szegedi talks about performance tuning Java and Scala programs at Twitter: how to approach GC problems, the importance of asynchronous I/O, when to use MySQL/Cassandra/Redis, and much more.

10 tips on how to prevent business value risk

One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.

Interview: Software Systems Architecture: Working With Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives

InfoQ spoke to the authors of Software Systems Architecture on a couple of new topics, the System Context viewpoint and Agile, which have been added to the second edition.