New-age Transactional Systems - Not Your Grandpa's OLTP
John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.
The content has been bookmarked!
There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.
Posted by Abel Avram on Feb 24, 2009
Code Contracts is the .NET implementation of the Design by Contract concept. While it was supposed to be delivered with .NET 4.0, Code Contracts is already available for download from DevLabs. Contracts impose certain restrictions on using APIs, making programming safer, having more validations and resulting in fewer unexpected errors during runtime.
Design by Contract, or Programming by Contract, is not a new concept in programming, many languages already having such implementations. Code Contract brings this programming paradigm to .NET. The basic idea is to establish a contract between the two parties involved: the client (caller) and the supplier (API called). By adhering to the terms of the contract, the client is more confident the supplier will supply expected results, and the supplier will be more confident that the client will make appropriate calls.
There are three types of contract conditions available for Code Contracts: pre-conditions, object invariants, and post-conditions. Pre-conditions are used, for example, to verify that a constructor or a method is called using the right parameter values. A post-condition is used to verify that a value returned is appropriate. Object invariants are used to enforce certain conditions on objects to make sure they don’t obtain illegal values.
While this sounds very similar to unit testing, what’s news is that those validations can be performed at build time. The compiler will make specific checks via Contracts to ensure that all the conditions specified are met, issuing warning if they are not. The programmer can immediately see if a condition is not going to be met and take corrective measures before running the code.
Currently, the DevLabs team works on including Contracts in the documentation generated for projects. By reading an API documentation, anyone will be able to see all the contract conditions specified for it.
The end result of using Code Contracts is better and safer code, more appropriate usage of external APIs, in the end better software.
Useful links: Code Contracts online documentation, Microsoft Research Code Contracts website, related forum.
A Guide to Branching and Merging Patterns
Agility at scale, become as agile as you can be
SCM best practices for multiple processes, releases & distributed teams
I think this will minimize the need to write unit tests to validate method behaviors when an invalid input is passed as passing an invalid input is not supported.
It looks like injected unit tests in runtime code.. however the contracts should be unit tested somehow.. but i don't think it will be that hard.
Can't wait to use this
John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.
Kevlin Henney examines code samples to see what can be learned from them starting from the premise that one won’t write great code unless he knows how to read it.
Jason Ayers share the observations he made watching a team of developers collaborating in real time on the same code base, pushing XP, pair programming and continuous integration to their extremes.
Michael Snoyman presents Yesod, a web framework written in Haskell and containing a web server, templating, ORM, libraries (templating, gravatar, etc.).
Richard Kreuter and Kyle Banker on how to avoid classical RDBMS transactional systems by using compensation mechanisms, transactional messaging or transactional procedures.
Attila Szegedi talks about performance tuning Java and Scala programs at Twitter: how to approach GC problems, the importance of asynchronous I/O, when to use MySQL/Cassandra/Redis, and much more.
One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.
InfoQ spoke to the authors of Software Systems Architecture on a couple of new topics, the System Context viewpoint and Agile, which have been added to the second edition.
1 comment
Watch Thread Reply