Cloud Foundry: Design and Architecture
Derek Collison discusses the goals, the design premises and patterns employed in creating the architecture of Cloud Foundry, VMware’s open source PaaS, unveiling internal architectural details.
The content has been bookmarked!
There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.
Posted by R.J. Lorimer on Feb 08, 2009
Ivy 2.0, the next version in the Ivy project dependency manager, has been released.
Key features of the 2.0.0 release are
- enhanced Maven2 compatibility, with several bug fixes and more pom features covered
- improved cache management, including dynamic revision caching with fine grain TTL
- improved concurrency support with cache locking and atomic publish
- namespace aware validation, allowing to use validation with extra attributes
- new 'packager' resolver added
- better and more homogeneous relative paths handling
- better support for local builds
- numerous bug fixes as documented in Jira and in the release notes
Apache Ivy is a tool for managing project dependencies. The Apache website further defines Ivy in these ways:
1. flexibility and configurability
Apache Ivy is essentially process agnostic and is not tied to any methodology or structure. Instead it provides the necessary flexibility and configurability to be adapted to a broad range of dependency management and build processes.
2. tight integration with Apache Ant
While available as a standalone tool, Apache Ivy works particularly well with Apache Ant providing a number of powerful Ant tasks ranging from dependency resolution to dependency reporting and publication.
The 2.0 release of Ivy has been a long time coming, after starting the effort with the move to an official Apache project over a year ago. There are a number of other changes in 2.0 beyond those mentioned above:
Ivy can be downloaded from the Apache Ivy home page. More information about how to use Ivy, and what features it provides are available in the 2.0 documentation.
Introducing SQLFire: a memory-optimized, high performance SQL database
Banking Case Study: Scaling with Low Latency using NewSQL
Adopting Git for the Enterprise: Risks and Considerations
App Server Evolution: REST, Cloud, and DevOps Support in Resin 4
VMware vFabric SQLFire - Test drive the data management system with memory speed, horizontal scalability and a familiar SQL interface
What is the difference between using Ivy and Maven?
Ivy = Dependency Manager. No more than that, no less than that.
Maven = Archetype based build system that also does dependency management.
Personally, I prefer Ivy because I feel it does dependency management better than Maven. I'm sure others will disagree with me and say they are equal or that maven does a better job.
In the end, if you have invested time/effort to learn maven and are over the learning curve it has, then I probably wouldn't add Ivy to the mix. However, if your build is an Ant build and you want to add dependency management, then I would reach for Ivy before trying to convert it to Maven.
We switched from doing manual dependency management to Ivy (using beta and RC 2.0 versions) over the last couple of months. We have a number of Java projects in an enterprise environment. We use Ant and are pretty happy with it. The combination of Ivy and Ant works really well.
My next step is to put Grapes (groovy.codehaus.org/Grape) to work with our Groovy scripts.
John Hurst
Derek Collison discusses the goals, the design premises and patterns employed in creating the architecture of Cloud Foundry, VMware’s open source PaaS, unveiling internal architectural details.
Andrew Watson talks about the work of the OMG, where CORBA is alive and well (hint: in your car), UML and UML Profiles vs. custom Modeling languages, DDS and other middleware, and much more.
Sohil Shah discusses creating iPhone and Android enterprise mobile applications based on cloud services using the open source platform OpenMobster.
Paul Sanford presents the transformations supported by data throughout its life cycle, and how that can be better done with Splunk, an engine for monitoring and analyzing machine-generated data.
A common “best practice” for unit tests is to only write a one assertion in each test. I intend to question this advice by showing that multiple assertions per test are both necessary and beneficial.
John Rauser presents the architectural and technological evolution of Amazon retail websites starting with 1994 and ending with adopting Amazon Web Services.
Michael Stal discusses system architecture quality, how to avoid architectural erosion, how to deal with refactoring, and design principles for architecture evolution.
Every developer has had to integrate with another system, API or component. Tis article provides strategies to handle the change and for he separating system boundaries.
3 comments
Watch Thread Reply