BT
x Your opinion matters! Please fill in the InfoQ Survey about your reading habits!

IBM-Sun Takeover Talks Collapse

by Charles Humble on Apr 06, 2009 |

IBM's talks to acquire Sun Microsystems have broken down according to media reports.

IBM reportedly offered around $9.50 per share, close to double the value of Sun's shares when the deal was first reported last month. This values Sun at $7bn and would be the largest deal in IBM’s history. The talks were said to be in their final stages and a high level of brinkmanship is common during late merger talks, so it is possible that the collapse in negotiations is not final. Whatever the truth however, news that the tie-up was in trouble sent Sun shares down 22% in morning trading, whilst IBM shares have dipped 2%.

Sun has struggled to turn a profit for some years as IT purchases have increasingly shifted from proprietary Unix hardware to commodity hardware running open source Unix variants such as Linux and Free BSD. In contrast IBM, itself in serious trouble in the 1990s, is a highly profitable organisation, making around $2.3-$2.8 billion a quarter over the last year. IBM’s interest is thought largely to focus on Sun’s software assets - Java, Solaris and MySQL.

The Wall Street Journal, which has been the source for much of the information in the public domain around the deal, is currently reporting that Sun’s board has split into two factions, with Scott McNealy opposing the transaction and Jonathan Schwartz in favour. If the talks have collapsed, Sun will find itself in the unenviable position of having to move rapidly to stabalise its stock price, as one interpretation of events for investors is that Schwartz does not believe the company can survive on its own. Indeed Paul Otellini, president and chief executive officer at Intel, has said on record that Sun was “shopped around the Valley and around the world in the last few months”. One probable consequence will be that both Schwartz and McNealy will be ousted from the company. Other possible suitors include Hewlett-Packard, Fujitsu, and Cisco Systems.

 

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Tell us what you think

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

people by Gerald Loeffler

...and all the while employees at Sun are following the news in the hope to catch a glimpse of what the future might bring for their employer and hence their contracts: will Sun slowly wither away; or rapidly die off; or be cut into pieces so that some may prosper (but which ones? - surely Cisco and IBM are not interested in retaining the exact some portions). it's a cruel process for the "asset" that may warrant a price of $7bn: the employees of Sun...

cheers,
gerald

www.gerald-loeffler.net/

I don’t think this will save Sun by William H

Everywhere I go these days where I used to see Sun boxes I now see beige ones. They know it to. And having effectively put Sun up for sale makes the business of selling its products all but impossible; why would I invest in Sun when it clearly doesn’t think it has a future.

If this is just a bluff and IBM acquires Sun then most Sun products will be killed off. If we’re extremely lucky then things like Glassfish, Netbeans etc. will be left to quietly die in the community without development funding. I also think Java itself will suffer badly. IBM has definite commercial interests which will conflict with those of other vendors and I can’t see it doing as good a job of managing this as Sun has. Looking at their voting record it has done more to politicise voting in the JCP than just about any other organisation (possible exception of Apache) and has regularly voted against new initiatives (EJB 3, WebBeans...) that improve the platform at a cost to the vendor. WebSphere has generally been slow to update to new versions of the EE standard and is horribly complex to configure correctly.

Sun has never got the credit it deserves for its stewardship of Java. Sadly if IBM acquires it people may well come to realise what I great job it was doing but then it will be too late.

Re: I don’t think this will save Sun by John Harby

I agree on the praise for Sun's stewardship. Some of the thought experiments many of us were going through about what IBM could/would do were not pleasant. Sun has been particularly benevolent in allowing many of us individuals to participate in the spec development and even the Executive Committee. I really don't see IBM doing the same although I certainly could be wrong.

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

3 Discuss

Educational Content

General Feedback
Bugs
Advertising
Editorial
InfoQ.com and all content copyright © 2006-2014 C4Media Inc. InfoQ.com hosted at Contegix, the best ISP we've ever worked with.
Privacy policy
BT