New-age Transactional Systems - Not Your Grandpa's OLTP
John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.
The content has been bookmarked!
There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.
Posted by Mirko Stocker on May 27, 2009
Rack has finally seen its 1.0 release a few weeks ago, introducing some backwards-incompatible changes to its specification and several updates and bug fixes since the last version.
Rack has become an important cornerstone of the Ruby web server and framework landscape. Before Rack, frameworks and servers had to be adapted to each others interfaces to work together. With Rack, there's a minimal API that wraps HTTP requests and responses, making the life of framework, server and application developers much more comfortable.
Rack has been widely adopted by the Ruby community, which reflects in the list of support servers:
These frameworks include Rack adapters in their distributions:
- Mongrel
- EventedMongrel
- SwiftipliedMongrel
- WEBrick
- FCGI
- CGI
- SCGI
- LiteSpeed
- Thin
- Ebb
- Fuzed
- Phusion Passenger (which is mod_rack for Apache and for nginx)
- Unicorn
- Camping
- Coset
- Halcyon
- Mack
- Maveric
- Merb
- Racktools::SimpleApplication
- Ramaze
- Ruby on Rails
- Rum
- Sinatra
- Sin
- Vintage
- Waves
- Wee
Rack also provides a basis for other software to provide features independently of frameworks, for example Rack::Cache.
We talked to Christian Neukirchen, the original developer of Rack to find out what he has in mind for Rack's future.
For the near future, we mostly will be bugfixing with only slight improvements to the specification. It is important that Rack stays stable and can be relied upon.
Are there other things that can be factored out of frameworks and be put into Rack?
I try to keep Rack small and focused, libraries and middleware related to special needs are better off as separate projects with their own maintainers and active community. Also, Rack should not restrict the frameworks in their ways of doing things.
More on Rack can be found on the Rack web site and in the 1.0 release announcement.
Using Drools? See what you're missing! Get the Power of Drools with the Assurance of Red Hat
Mobile and the New Two-Tiered Web Architecture
Agile Practices to Improve Project Management Organization (PMO) Effectiveness
John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.
Kevlin Henney examines code samples to see what can be learned from them starting from the premise that one won’t write great code unless he knows how to read it.
Jason Ayers share the observations he made watching a team of developers collaborating in real time on the same code base, pushing XP, pair programming and continuous integration to their extremes.
Michael Snoyman presents Yesod, a web framework written in Haskell and containing a web server, templating, ORM, libraries (templating, gravatar, etc.).
Richard Kreuter and Kyle Banker on how to avoid classical RDBMS transactional systems by using compensation mechanisms, transactional messaging or transactional procedures.
Attila Szegedi talks about performance tuning Java and Scala programs at Twitter: how to approach GC problems, the importance of asynchronous I/O, when to use MySQL/Cassandra/Redis, and much more.
One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.
InfoQ spoke to the authors of Software Systems Architecture on a couple of new topics, the System Context viewpoint and Agile, which have been added to the second edition.
No comments
Watch Thread Reply