Exclusive updates on:

The DLR’s Adaptive Compiler

by Jonathan Allen on Oct 07, 2009 |

The Dynamic Language Runtime has significant performance improvements over traditional interpreters for Python and Ruby, once it is warned up. But for code you only use once or twice, it costs more to compile the expression tree than to simply interpret it.

The DLR solves this issue by introducing what they call an Adaptive Compiler. Normally the DLR will interpret expression trees instead of compiling them. If it sees a given tree is used repeatedly, then it will compile it in a background thread to be used by future calls. According to Microsoft, this is giving IronPython 2.6 a significant performance boost over earlier versions.

Because this technology is backed into the DLR, any dynamic language targeting it may opt-in for this behavior.

Related Editorial

Infographic: Just How Big is the Nerd Economy

eBook: The New Kingmakers - How Developers Conquered the World

Go Mobile with your Java EE Web Apps

ICEmobile in a Minute - The Easiest Way to Mobilize Your Enterprise Apps

Why NoSQL - Three Trends Disrupting the Database Status Quo

Related Sponsor

Get code level visibility into your web apps. All for free.

Try New Relic Today.

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Tell us what you think

Community comments

Benchmarks by Doug Winter Posted

Re: Benchmarks by Ex Raven Posted

Re: Benchmarks by Doug Winter Posted

Re: Benchmarks by Jonathan Allen Posted

Benchmarks by Doug Winter

So, are there any benchmarks of this new DLR against the CPython implementation? It would be great to see if it really does deliver that much better performance.

Re: Benchmarks by Ex Raven

Here's a link that might be useful to you: CodePlex: IronPython Performance

Re: Benchmarks by Doug Winter

Very very mixed, if I am reading those results correctly.

I'd generally take benchmarks with a pinch of salt, but I have to say I think they have some more work to do on the DLR yet ;)

Re: Benchmarks by Jonathan Allen

Once they have Python 2.6 compatibility, they are shifting their focus to performance. Up until now they have been playing catch-up, but they expect to have some breathing room while Python plans their 3.2 feature set.