New-age Transactional Systems - Not Your Grandpa's OLTP
John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.
The content has been bookmarked!
There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.
Posted by Jonathan Allen on Nov 08, 2009
As both WPF and Silverlight increase in importance among .NET developers, the confusion about the difference between the two has also increased. Back in June Wintellect released a little known but incredibly important whitepaper on the topic simply titled Microsoft WPF-Silverlight Comparison Whitepaper. While we recommend GUI developers read all 69 pages, we offer you a summary of the major ones that impact line-of-business developers.
Dependency properties are a key component of both platforms, with PropertyMetadata being used to back properties instead of normal fields. While Silverlight only offers this one class, WPF has some subtypes.
Silverlight doesn’t support tunneling events. Both platforms support direct and bubbling events.
WPF supports several types of triggers. A basic trigger attaches to a dependency property and automatically applies style changes when the trigger condition is met. In addition to basic triggers, WPF also supports triggers that respond to routed events and triggers that work with data-binding. Instead of triggers, Silverlight uses a technology called Visual State Manager instead. WPF doesn’t currently offer this, but will in WPF 4.0.
Silverlight only supports a few markup extensions. In addition to the shared StaticResource, Binding, and TemplateBinding extensions, WPF adds DynamicResource, RelativeSource, x:Type, x:Static, and x:Array.
There are numerous keyboard and mouse events only available in WPF. As there are far too many to list here, we will defer to the full text.
UIElement class and the IInputElement interface. When a control is disabled, WPF uses this to disable all of the child controls. Silverlight doesn’t offer this behavior, so developers have to walk the control tree manually.
On the communication side, WCF in Silverlight is limited to BasicHttpBinding and PollingDuplexHttpBinding. WPF, of course, supports all of the available bindings.
Finally, printing is completely different in WPF and Silverlight. WPF allows the direct printing of visual trees while Silverlight relies on the browser.
Using Drools? See what you're missing! Get the Power of Drools with the Assurance of Red Hat
SCM best practices for multiple processes, releases & distributed teams
Getting Started with Stratos - an Open Source Cloud Platform
Improve Java Garbage Collection, Runtime Execution, and JVM visibility with Zing
I'm currently writing a series of blog posts on code reuse between WPF and Silverlight. Table of contents can be found here.
I'm looking forward to reading it, the source I cited was released before Silverlight 3 was complete and needs to be updated with the final feature set.
John Hugg discusses high volume transaction processing applications with high and low frequency profiles, and how VoltDB can be used for that purpose.
Kevlin Henney examines code samples to see what can be learned from them starting from the premise that one won’t write great code unless he knows how to read it.
Jason Ayers share the observations he made watching a team of developers collaborating in real time on the same code base, pushing XP, pair programming and continuous integration to their extremes.
Michael Snoyman presents Yesod, a web framework written in Haskell and containing a web server, templating, ORM, libraries (templating, gravatar, etc.).
Richard Kreuter and Kyle Banker on how to avoid classical RDBMS transactional systems by using compensation mechanisms, transactional messaging or transactional procedures.
Attila Szegedi talks about performance tuning Java and Scala programs at Twitter: how to approach GC problems, the importance of asynchronous I/O, when to use MySQL/Cassandra/Redis, and much more.
One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.
InfoQ spoke to the authors of Software Systems Architecture on a couple of new topics, the System Context viewpoint and Agile, which have been added to the second edition.
2 comments
Watch Thread Reply