When ScrumMaster Becomes the Impediment ...
A ScrumMaster as the name suggests is the guardian of the scrum process. He is a change agent supporting his team besides educating and socializing Scrum throughout the organization. He ensures smooth functioning of the team by eradicating impediments and keeping the team shielded from external distractions. However, in certain scenarios, Agile teams feel that the Scrum Master is the biggest impediment.
Siddharta described a scenario, that he finds prevalent in the offshore teams due to cultural hierarchy and traditional communication strategy. Here, the ScrumMaster ends up becoming a bottleneck between the team and the customer.
Many teams are touchy about giving the team member access to the customer or even the Product Owner (especially if they are remote). So the information flow is likeYou <-> ScrumMaster <-> Product Owner <-> Customer
Tobias Mayer reacted to this by suggesting that if the ScrumMaster is becoming a go-between for the teams then the root cause of the issue is elsewhere.
[This is] a simple command and control management style. Calling someone a ScrumMaster doesn’t make him one, especially if he is deeply ingrained in “old thinking” and is not being coached away from that.
Jaibeer Malik ,echoed Tobias when he mentioned that the cause seemed to be the way Agile is being implemented and followed. He stressed on communication being the cornerstone of an Agile process and all members of the team should be equipped to communicate with anyone on the team without going through the ScrumMaster.
Roberto Fasciolo, however pointed out other reasons where the ScrumMasters were falling into the trap of traditional ways of working. He observed the following pitfalls,
- Scrummaster committing to the sprint backlog – This is particularly prevalent when the ScrumMaster is also the team member. The team simply agrees to what he has to say.
- Scrummaster telling the team what to do instead of coaching - This happens many times when the scrummaster is a former project manager. The effect is that the team might become completely dependent on its scrummaster.
- Scrummaster acting as proxy between the team and the product owner – This is similar to the situation that Siddharta described and is prevalent in distributed offshore teams.
Mike Cottmeyer added that if the ScrumMaster is just keeping track of impediments then he is the impediment. A good ScrumMaster should not only be able to track and remove impediments but also be an Anticipator who could anticipate problems and work with the team to ferret out things which could go wrong.
The catch here is that the Scrum master is doing “valuable” project tasks. He or she is trying to do work which other team members might depend on to do their tasks. It can even go so far that the Scrum Master gets the feeling that they can’t get the Sprint done without him/her pitching in and picking up those all important / difficult tasks.
Boris Gloger, also had a similar story to say when he suggested that ScrumMaster (SM) does not mean (S)uper (M)an. A scrum master who is not doing his role properly or is trying to do multiple roles apart from his main role is actually an impediment to the team.
Hence, there are many situations in which a ScrumMaster, knowingly or unknowingly would impede the performance of the team. The key lies in identifying these situations early and take corrective action while there is still hope.
I have worked with that ScrumMaster!
Thank you for talking about this!
Re: I have worked with that ScrumMaster!
Re: I have worked with that ScrumMaster!
I've worked with Scrum, I've developed strong stigmatism towards the methodology.
ouch! that sounds a bit harsh and more like attacking the symptom than the root cause. I guess it would be better to do a retrospective on what is not going well and take corrective action. After all the methodology is also executed by people. If the people are executing it the wrong way then there is a bigger concern with the people than the methodology.