10 tips on how to prevent business value risk
One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.
The content has been bookmarked!
There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.
Posted by Dilip Krishnan on Jan 20, 2010
“Everyone feels the need to write a custom authentication protocol” says George Reese, which he claims is one of the things he learnt working on a programming API for cloud providers and Saas Vendors. In a post George proposes a set of standards for any REST authentication need.
George who has developed against myraid web service API’s, observes that each one requires a different authentication mechanism.
I'm tired of wasting brain cycles figuring out whether vendor A requires you to sign your query before or after you URL encode your parameters and I am fed up with vendors who insist on using interactive user credentials to authenticate API calls.
He outlines the rules for designing authentication schemes for REST API’s. “Let's just be blunt: if you aren't encrypting your API calls, you aren't even pretending to be secure”, He says,
1. All REST API calls must take place over HTTPS with a certificate signed by a trusted CA. All clients must validate the certificate before interacting with the server.
Through the use of certificates signed by a trusted authority, SSL also protects you against "man-in-the-middle" attacks in which an agent inserts itself between client and server and sniffs the "encrypted" traffic.
If you are not validating the SSL certificate of the server, you don't know who is receiving your REST queries.
2. All REST API calls should occur through dedicated API keys consisting of an identifying component and a shared, private secret. Systems must allow a given customer to have multiple active API keys and de-activate individual keys easily.
The first important thing is that a system making a REST query is NOT an interactive user. […] REST is authenticating a program and not person, it allows for stronger authentication than human user ID/password schemes allow.
The second part says that each REST server should support multiple API keys for each customer. This requirement makes it simpler to isolate potential compromises and address them when they happen. […] When an application is compromised, you also need an elegant way to roll out replacement API keys.
3. All REST queries must be authenticated by signing the query parameters sorted in lower-case, alphabetical order using the private credential as the signing token. Signing should occur before URL encoding the query string.
In other words, you don't pass the shared secret component of the API key as part of the query, but instead use it to sign the query. Your queries end up looking like this:
GET /object?timestamp=1261496500&apiKey=Qwerty2010&signature=abcdef0123456789The string being signed is "/object?apikey=Qwerty2010×tamp=1261496500" and the signature is the HMAC-SHA256 hash of that string using the private component of the API key.
He admits that in most RESTlike and RESTFul API solutions that authentication is most certainly a secondary consideration. However, in the conclusion of his article he urges readers "to follow someone else's example and not roll your own authentication scheme”.
Be sure to weigh in on the recommendations. The original post can be found at the O’Rielly community blogs.
In my company we write a javascript client that issues REST calls via AJAX to the server and gets the data in JSON form.
some of these calls are in global pages which do not (by product decision) require users authentication.
however, i woould like to know if my own client is trying to get info or some bot that somebody wrote.
how can i generate a key in javascript environment where my code is out there are can be copied and used ?
Thanks,
One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.
InfoQ spoke to the authors of Software Systems Architecture on a couple of new topics, the System Context viewpoint and Agile, which have been added to the second edition.
Alex Papadimoulis discusses ugly code, where it comes from, how to avoid it, and how to get rid of it.
John Davies examines Visa’s architecture and shows how enterprises have architected complex integrations incorporating Hadoop, memcached, Ruby on Rails, and others to deliver innovative solutions.
Sean Comerford unveils ESPN.com’s architecture, what components are used and why, and the current changes the website goes through.
Are there repeated patterns of failure on Enterprise Agile Enablement efforts? Sanjiv and Arlen discuss Seven Deadly Sins to avoid when adopting Agile in an enterprise.
Erik Dörnenburg answers: What is Enterprise and Evolutionary Architecture?, discussing 4 issues: Turning strategy into execution, Ensuring conformance, Where do the architects sit? Buying or building?
Sean Cribbs explains what Map-Reduce and Riak are, why and how to use Map-Reduce with Riak, and how to convert SQL queries into their Map-Reduce equivalents.
1 comment
Watch Thread Reply