Cloud Foundry: Design and Architecture
Derek Collison discusses the goals, the design premises and patterns employed in creating the architecture of Cloud Foundry, VMware’s open source PaaS, unveiling internal architectural details.
The content has been bookmarked!
There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.
Posted by Tim Cull on Jan 13, 2011
This week, MuleSoft released version 3.1 of its enterprise service bus, Mule ESB. Mule 3.0 was released in September with one major focus: "simplify everything...to make Mule 3 more accessible to everyone". Mule 3.1 takes the simplification further by focusing on Mule Cloud Connect, Mule Flow and BPM.
Mule Cloud Connect is the branding for Mule's ability to use publicly available services. Version 3.1 ships with only four connectors to use Twitter, SalesForce and online payment services Authorize.Net and Cybersource. All of the Mule announcements use Twitter as an example, so to change things up below is an example of Authorize.NET processing a credit card payment:
<auth:config merchantLogin="<YOUR MERCHANT LOGIN>" merchantTransactionKey="<YOUR MERCHANT TRANSACTION KEY>" name="auth" testMode="true"/>
<flow name="payment">
<http:inbound-endpoint address="http://localhost:9898/payment" exchange-pattern="request-response"/>
<auth:authorization-and-capture cardNumber="370000000000002" expDate="12/12" amount="400"/>
<expression-transformer>
<return-argument evaluator="bean" expression="responseReasonText"/>
</expression-transformer>
</flow>
Developers can also build their own cloud connectors (instructions, login required) that use their own, custom XML schema for configuration.
Mule Flow, which was introduced in version 3.0, was improved with added support for three higher-level abstractions: "invoke" which calls a service, "poll" which monitors an endpoint and triggers a process when something arrives, and "enricher" which can take the results of a system call and inject them into the payload of the currently running process. In addition, version 3.1 upgrades the underlying version of Apache CXF to 2.3.0 and adds support for Spring Security v3.
Lastly, Mule loosened up its relationship with Business Process Management (BPM). jBPM is "now a component in Mule rather than a transport, this not only enable the use case when we are connecting to an external BPM engine but also enable the use case when using jBPM "inside" Mule to process messages". One practical implication of this change is that the BPM transport that was deprecated as of Mule 3.0.1 has now been removed in 3.1. The new recommended way to interact with BPM is via the "<bpm:process>" message processor.
While Mule code is open source under the CPAL license, extra features like the Mule management console and other features require a commercial license. Other alternatives to Mule include Apache ServiceMix, Apache Synapse and JBoss ESB. With 3.1's Flow capability, Mule also starts to resemble integration solutions like Apache Camel and Spring Integration.
Tutorial: Integrating SQLFire with tc Server and Spring Data
Troubleshoot Java/.NET performance while getting full visibility in production
Introduction to WebSphere Liberty Profile
Introducing SQLFire: a memory-optimized, high performance SQL database
VMware vFabric SQLFire - Test drive the data management system with memory speed, horizontal scalability and a familiar SQL interface
Derek Collison discusses the goals, the design premises and patterns employed in creating the architecture of Cloud Foundry, VMware’s open source PaaS, unveiling internal architectural details.
Andrew Watson talks about the work of the OMG, where CORBA is alive and well (hint: in your car), UML and UML Profiles vs. custom Modeling languages, DDS and other middleware, and much more.
Sohil Shah discusses creating iPhone and Android enterprise mobile applications based on cloud services using the open source platform OpenMobster.
Paul Sanford presents the transformations supported by data throughout its life cycle, and how that can be better done with Splunk, an engine for monitoring and analyzing machine-generated data.
A common “best practice” for unit tests is to only write a one assertion in each test. I intend to question this advice by showing that multiple assertions per test are both necessary and beneficial.
John Rauser presents the architectural and technological evolution of Amazon retail websites starting with 1994 and ending with adopting Amazon Web Services.
Michael Stal discusses system architecture quality, how to avoid architectural erosion, how to deal with refactoring, and design principles for architecture evolution.
Every developer has had to integrate with another system, API or component. Tis article provides strategies to handle the change and for he separating system boundaries.
No comments
Watch Thread Reply