Exclusive updates on:

Article: A History of Extended Transactions

by Diana Plesa on May 09, 2006 |

ACID transactions don't work for long-lived use cases. This article documents historic approaches taken in the CORBA and J2EE communities toward extended transactions, how SOA is a more natural fit, and why WS-TX & WS-CAF may finally hold the answer.

Read: A History of Extended Transactions

Related Editorial

Cluster-Wide Caching & Scaling for the Cloud - A Look Inside Resin 4.0

Application Performance Management Buyer's Guide

A Unified Mobile Architecture for the Modern Data Center

APM Survival Guide from a Veteran Performance Geek

The Rise of the Composite API Platform, a ‘Best-of-Breed’ API Management Solution

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Tell us what you think

Community comments

printer friendly link by sanjiv kumar Posted

Re: printer friendly link by Ahmed Mohombe Posted

Re: printer friendly link by Alex Popescu Posted

Re: printer friendly link by Chris Hopcroft Posted

Great article! by Faui Gerzigerk Posted

printer friendly link by sanjiv kumar

Can we have a printer friendly link please ?

Re: printer friendly link by Ahmed Mohombe

Sanjiv,

As it was stated in this article:
www.infoq.com/news/InfoQ-Unlaunched

the site is still in beta and aditional features (like those mentioned there, will follow soon).

Ahmed.

Re: printer friendly link by Alex Popescu

Thanks Ahmed. Indeed we have a long list of features on which we are working (and small fixes too :-) ).

./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.

InfoQ Chief Architect

Great article! by Faui Gerzigerk

Thanks for this great article! It's very useful, it has the right length and depth and the collection of references is much appreciated. Keep up the good work!

Re: printer friendly link by Chris Hopcroft

Use Firefox to browse to the article and save the page to your desktop, open that saved HTML page and print that. Format is nicer regards printing, and it's easy enough to throw away (recycle) the 'guff' (like my comment!) from the top and bottom of the print out.

Great article BTW!

Re: printer friendly link by Chris Hopcroft

That should work until the printer friendly links are in place.