Article: A History of Extended Transactions

Posted by Diana Plesa on May 09, 2006

Sections

Enterprise Architecture,

Architecture & Design

Topics

WS Standards ,

Web Services ,

OASIS ,

SOA ,

Transactions Processing ,

Enterprise Architecture ,

Architecture ,

Database ,

WS-CAF ,

ACID ,

Specifications ,

WS-TX ,

OASIS_BTP ,

Transactions

Share |

RELATED Research

ACID transactions don't work for long-lived use cases. This article documents historic approaches taken in the CORBA and J2EE communities toward extended transactions, how SOA is a more natural fit, and why WS-TX & WS-CAF may finally hold the answer.

Read: A History of Extended Transactions

RelatedVendorContent

Getting Started with REST: Free Cheat Sheet

The WebSphere Liberty Profile for Developers: An Introduction

Architectures You've Always Wondered About @QCon New York

Cloud Access 360 Overview

Modeling Your Cloud Services Brokerage

Related Sponsor

*Free Gartner Cloud Security Report
*REST Security Reference Card
*Securing your APIs in the Cloud

1. Back to top

   printer friendly link

   by sanjiv kumar

   Can we have a printer friendly link please ?

   Reply

2. Back to top

   Re: printer friendly link

   by Ahmed Mohombe

   Sanjiv,
   
   As it was stated in this article:
   www.infoq.com/news/InfoQ-Unlaunched
   
   the site is still in beta and aditional features (like those mentioned there, will follow soon).
   
   Ahmed.

   Reply

3. Back to top

   Re: printer friendly link

   by Alex Popescu

   Thanks Ahmed. Indeed we have a long list of features on which we are working (and small fixes too :-) ).
   
   ./alex
   --
   .w( the_mindstorm )p.
   
   InfoQ Chief Architect

   Reply

4. Back to top

   Great article!

   by Faui Gerzigerk

   Thanks for this great article! It's very useful, it has the right length and depth and the collection of references is much appreciated. Keep up the good work!

   Reply

5. Back to top

   Re: printer friendly link

   by Chris Hopcroft

   Use Firefox to browse to the article and save the page to your desktop, open that saved HTML page and print that. Format is nicer regards printing, and it's easy enough to throw away (recycle) the 'guff' (like my comment!) from the top and bottom of the print out.
   
   Great article BTW!

   Reply

6. Back to top

   Re: printer friendly link

   by Chris Hopcroft

   That should work until the printer friendly links are in place.

   Reply