InfoQ

News

Industry Survey Reveals The Bitter Truth About IT ROI

Posted by Deborah Hartmann on Aug 17, 2006 05:30 PM

Community
Agile
Topics
Delivering Value ,
Leadership
Tags
ROI ,
Management ,
Value & Metrics ,
Statistics
The Ziff-Davis CIO Insight July 2006 Business Value survey reveals The Bitter Truth About ROI.  In the two years since their last such survey, there has been little improvement in how (or how well) IT is measuring value delivered.  The survey observes:
True, most firms now try to use metrics such as internal rate of return, return on assets, net present value, or activity-based costing. But besides customer satisfaction there's no consensus or consistency on which measures to use. It's still not a given that ROI should be measured both before and after a project. And half of all executives surveyed, whether IT or business executives, doubt that the measures are even accurate.
Findings include:

Only six out of ten companies measure the business value of IT.
At most companies, it's just guesswork.

Do CIOs measure business value often enough?
Only half do an ROI assessment both before and after an IT project is completed

Skepticism about ROI and business value metrics remains high.
Whether they measure in dollars or look at other forms of value, about half of respondents are skeptical about the accuracy of the numbers

IT executives exaggerate IT's impact on productivity.
Most IT executives believe technology's contribution to productivity is much higher than is indicated by economic indicators like the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

How best to measure IT's value?
No one "right way" to measure the value of IT emerges from the study.

Many technologies and IT services are meeting, and even exceeding, their business value expectations.
Security, systems development and web services do the best job of meeting or exceeding business value expectations; outsourcing, CRM and ERP fare worst.

Former ROI surveys are also available on the CIO Insight site:

Related Sponsor

VersionOne is recognized by Agile practitioners as the leader in Agile project management tools. Companies such as Adobe, BBC, CNN, Dow, HP, IBM, Sony and 3M have turned to VersionOne to help deliver greater value to their customers.
ROI is an excuse for not listening to users by j c Posted Aug 18, 2006 9:15 PM
  1. Every failed IT effort to get ROI from making something more efficient Ive seen didnt take into account current business practices sufficiently and just said well if I plop this system down I will save money. For example, having business process engineering folks going to satellite offices and coming back with a suggestion for a "new system" when the computers the users are using are crashing or operating so slowly they can barely do their jobs. Yeah, a new application is JUST what they need. Or companies using IT apps as a political ploy to unify operating practices between satellite offices and putting the home office stamp of approval on an application while ignoring the needs of the majority of the company. What does ROI mean if your software effort is doomed to fail and usually does? Maybe ROI should be second to success. Because ROI has been used to justify so many software failures. Maybe ROIs time is up.

Educational Content

Bindings, Platforms, and Innovation

This presentation focuses on the Internet and separating myth from fact, history from the future, and the mundane from the imaginative. Bob Frankston presents a vision of what could and should be.

Orchestrating Long Running Activities with JBoss / JBPM

This article explores the use of JBoss and jBPM to implement design solutions that effectively address the issue of orchestrating long running activities.

Neo4j - The Benefits of Graph Databases

This presentation covers the use of graph databases as an optimal solution for data that is difficult to fit in static tables, rapidly evolving data or data that has a lot of optional attributes.

Realistic about Risk: Software development with Real Options

This session introduces Real Options and shows how it can help in running your project. Real Options is a decision-making process that can be used to manage risk.

Communication Flexibility Using Bindings

This article discusses the use of bindings on services and references (including the instance of non-configured bindings) as the means to implement SCA communications in a Web and SOA environment.

Writing DSLs in Groovy

After a short introduction to DSLs, Scott Davis plays with the keyboard showing how to approach the creation of a DSL by typing working snippets of Groovy code that get executed.

Scaling Agile with C/ALM (Collaborative Application Lifecycle Management)

IBM Rational and InfoQ present, Scaling Agile with C/ALM, an eBook showing organizations how to become “finely tuned software delivery machines” by enabling team integration and scaling.

Concurrent Programming with Microsoft F#

Amanda Laucher presents a real life enterprise application written in F#. She shows actual code snippets, explaining design decisions and suggesting how to use some of the F# constructs.