"Literate Testing" for Readable JUnit Tests

Posted by Deborah Hartmann on Jun 15, 2006 02:07 PM

Community

Java,

Agile

Topics

Agile Techniques

Tags

Innovations,

Testing

Brian Marick, a frequent writer on Agile software testing, has reported that Robert Chatley and Tom White are working on sentence style for testing in Java, to make tests easier to understand. They call it "Literate Testing".

One thing their teams like is the idea of constraints: now they always use the org.jmock.MockObjectTestCase base class rather than junit.framework.TestCase, even when they aren't mocking anything out!  Here's an example from Tom White:

We can use constraints to construct more flexible assertions:
assertThat(a, eq("3"));

is more readable and understandable than:
assertEquals("3", a);

You can read it as "assert that a eq(uals) 3".

In a subsequent entry, White introduces the concept of anaphor, a word used to avoid repetition. When judiciously used, in a situation where there is no ambiguity to obscure the reference, it can increase test readability.

Small tricks like changing IDE settings are also used increase readability.

Robert Chatley has recently taken the idea of literate testing further and applied it to functional (acceptance) tests.

And now, we've come full circle:  Chatley tells us that Marick is in the sentence structure game, now, too :-)

1. Back to top

   TestNG asserts are readable too

   Jun 16, 2006 10:05 AM by Alex Popescu

   TestNG has done a similar shift a long time ago. JUnit users were used with assertions in the form: assertEquals(expectedValue, computedValue [, reason]). We have considered that it is more readable (even if some of TestNG users considered it dangerous) as in assertEquals(computedValue, expectedValue [, reason]) with its English form: "assert that computedValue equals the expectedValue because reason". However, we still offer the JUnit assertion mode (see Assert and AssertJUnit). ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p.

   Reply

• Older >