Enterprise NoSQL: Silver Bullet or Poison Pill?
Recorded at:
Re: Impressive talk!
by
Billy Newport
Thats the fine line here. I designed and sell a nosql type product with IBM WebSphere eXtreme Scale. It's absolutely in my interest to see this deployed and used in enterprises. People are reading about the various .coms using it and raving about it. Peoples expectations or knowledge levels vary wildly between .com culture and the enterprise world. The point of the talk wasn't to push SQL or NoSQL, it was simply to spread some of the insider knowledge on whats a good fit for either.
I wouldn't want anyone to think I'm pushing an agenda here against NoSQL. It's the opposite, I just want to see a more educated decision when enterprise architects select this technology. Remember, we need success stories in the enterprise for this to really take off. A few publicized failures possibly because of bad uses cases is bad news for everyone.
Re: Data centric vs question centric
by
Billy Newport
Re: Impressive talk!
by
Thomas Santana
All in all I think he has some very interesting point to consider when looking at becoming Not Only SQL.
Enjoyed it a lot
by
Hermann Schmidt
I especially enjoyed the part about "skill level", which is not related to NoSQL in particular, but bears lots of wisdom.
NoSQL does not make life easier. There are even more choices to make and mechanisms to understand than before. Life became more complex once again for developers.
The talk left no doubt about this.
Re: Enjoyed it a lot
by
john czerwiec
If such choices are made without the appropriate input of business analysts, infrastructure teams and integration specialists the end result will "showcase" the shortcomings of new approaches.
Great talk!
by
Nicholas Piasecki
Re: Great template
by
Alex Miller
Re: Data centric vs question centric
by
Chandrasekhar S
Talks makes one think before jumping into a NOSQL solution.
But I have a slight disagreement in the analogy made based on the queries like bank balance etc, NOSQL solutions never try to solve such problems or claim to be best fit for the scenarios where there business needs are more strict transactional in nature.So I wish if there was one slide which touch base where NOSQL solution's really fits in.
Re: Data centric vs question centric
by
Hans-Dieter Böhlau
In scenarios you know, that your datamodel evolves over time and data access is done over an clearly defined api, you can deal with a no-schema approach on database level very well. But as Bill said, there different aspects to keep in mind when you define the data management architecture ...
Very Good
by
Randy Schnier
Re: Very Good
by
Tiberiu Fustos
Forrester just named Master Data Management as a "hot" technology to reach maturity in 2011. I guess we will not get rid of the "system of record" for a long time to come. The search for the "source of truth" in enterprises with 500+ integrated applications is on-going.
Investing in maintaining all the logic in the applications and having for each use case a different representation of the same data (domain object, business object etc.) might actually lead increased costs compared to RDBMS while solving some other problems such as scalability. Need to think about it :-) And keep an eye on VoltDB...
Re: Impressive talk, indeed!
by
Mikhail Vladimirov
Re: Impressive talk!
by
Jeff Roughgarden
GigaSpaces is not a key value cache
by
Shay Hassidim
GigaSpaces is not a key/value cache. It was never a key/value cache since it was born from the JavaSpace specification. You can use it as a distributed map, but this will be using a fraction of its power.
GigaSpaces is a Documented oriented / Object SQL In-Memory-Data-Grid.
It support both POJO/PONO (.Net)/POCO (C++) objects as well Documents (XML/JSON).
It comes with Document API , JavaSpace , Map , JPA, JDBC , JDBC , memCache API and rest API.
Shay




Hello stranger!
You need to Register an InfoQ account or Login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.
Tell us what you think