InfoQ

InfoQ

Presentation

My Bookmarks

Login or Register to enable bookmarks for unlimited time.

The content has been bookmarked!

There was an error bookmarking this content! Please retry.

Recorded at:
Recorded at

Introduction to Agile for Traditional Project Managers

Presented by Stacia Broderick on Jul 13, 2008 Length 01:26:11
Sections
Process & Practices,
Enterprise Architecture
Topics
Business Process Management ,
Agile ,
Adopting Agile ,
Agile Techniques
Tags
Agile Alliance ,
Agile2007
 

How would you like to view the presentation?

In case you are having issues watching this video, please follow these simple steps to help us investigate the issue:
1. Right click on the video player and select Copy log
2. Paste the copied information in an email to video-issue@infoq.com (clicking this link will fill in the default details in most email clients).
Note: in case your email client hasn't automatically picked up the email subject, please include in your email the URL of the video too.
3. Done.
We will investigate the issue and get back to you as soon as possible. Thanks for helping us improve our site!
Summary
In this presentation filmed during Agile 2007, Stacia Broderick introduces Agile to traditionally trained project managers by making a comparison between Project Management Institute's (PMI) best practices and their equivalent Agile techniques.

Bio
Stacia has helped more than 150 software development teams and 30+ organizations embrace the principles of and transition to agile since 2003. From Fortune 500s to startups, government, service, financial and manufacturing, Stacia has seen agile implemented in just about every sector possible.

About the conference
The Agile Alliance organizes an annual international Agile conference, which brings together the key people in the Agile space to talk about techniques and technologies, attitudes and policies, research and experience, and the management and development sides of Agile software development.

11 comments

Watch Thread Reply

Another related series... by Kevin E. Schlabach Posted
Re: Another related series... by Serkan Karaarslan Posted
Re: Another related series... by Leo Gomes Posted
Re: Another related series... by Stacia Broderick Posted
Re: Another related series... by Deborah Hartmann Posted
8 minutes in and nothing but drivel by Stephen Cresswell Posted
Re: 8 minutes in and nothing but drivel by Bruce Rennie Posted
Re: 8 minutes in and nothing but drivel by Stephen Cresswell Posted
Re: 8 minutes in and nothing but drivel by Stacia Broderick Posted
Re: 8 minutes in and nothing but drivel by mz ma Posted
Not getting to the point by Olivier Gourment Posted
  1. Back to top

    Another related series...

    by Kevin E. Schlabach

    There is also a very good series on VersionOne's "Agile Chronicles Blog" by Mike Cottmeyer. All the posts in the series are prefixed with "Refactor your PMP".

    URL of a recent post: blog.versionone.net/blog/2008/07/refactor-your-...

  2. Back to top

    8 minutes in and nothing but drivel

    by Stephen Cresswell

    Maybe it gets better after this. The end point for me was when Stacia fobbed off a question about how scrum deals with thrashing.

  3. Back to top

    Re: 8 minutes in and nothing but drivel

    by Bruce Rennie

    Hey, how does waterfall deal with thrashing?

  4. Back to top

    Not getting to the point

    by Olivier Gourment

    Very good title, but deceiving content. Skip this presentation and go to one of Jeff Sutherland's presentations, such as www.infoq.com/presentations/Agile-Management-Go...

  5. Back to top

    Re: 8 minutes in and nothing but drivel

    by Stephen Cresswell

    Change control boards! (see Jeff Sutherland's Google presentation which was excellent).

  6. Back to top

    Re: 8 minutes in and nothing but drivel

    by Stacia Broderick

    Sorry that the folks posting here have found this presentation to be full of drivel and deceiving. It certainly was not intended to be. I never intentionally "fob off" questions; I care about the perception of the work I do and take these kinds of comments to heart. I will watch this presentation to see where I can improve. If you'd like to email me off line with helpful comments, I am always open to that in the spirit of inspecting and adapting. stacia@agileevolution.com.

  7. Back to top

    Re: 8 minutes in and nothing but drivel

    by mz ma

    Where does your experience about agile come from sina you are so young.
    if I cannot touch so many projects and how can I prove my agile ability?

    hi, I like your presentations and your voice

  8. Back to top

    Re: Another related series...

    by Serkan Karaarslan

    I think, she clarifies what the agile development is.
    Thank you Stacia

  9. Back to top

    Re: Another related series...

    by Leo Gomes

    I think the guys criticizing missed the point since the title is clear, it's an Introduction to Agile for Traditional Project Managers. So if you're not a traditional guy and/or you're already acquainted with agile, you might think it's superficial. I think it's good in what it's intended to be, a way to link traditional concepts to agile. Jeff Sutherland's Google presentation is also good and I think both are worth watching.

  10. Back to top

    Re: Another related series...

    by Stacia Broderick

    I had an email exchange with Stephen Cresswell over the weekend who gave me some very helpful feedback on the presentation. I agree that the preamble is a bit long; I promise a better one when I co-present this with Michele Sliger at Agile 08 next month. More importantly, I answered a question and went on a tangent, and it became a bit flubbed. I want to clear the record here so that newbies to agile aren't misguided. I said that "... moving too fast or not fast enough is the ownership of the business or the customer." This is not true. The product owner/customer owns the "What" and the "Why" of the requirements; the speed of delivery is completely up to the team and can be affected by an assortment of constraints and variables. The team and the product owner should work together to find ways to collaborate the best approach under the given circumstances, but at the end of the day, the team should choose a pace that is sustainable, iteration after iteration - a pace that results in high quality software increments. I hope this clarifies and dissuades any potential confusion. That's the thing about videos: they're permanent. :) And to ma mz: I'm not as young as you think I look.

  11. Back to top

    Re: Another related series...

    by Deborah Hartmann

    I'll vouch for the age-defying effects of Agile!

    There's something to be said for an approach that reduces stress and increases the pleasure of a job well done :-)

    deb
    (age: 96)

Educational Content

10 tips on how to prevent business value risk

One category of risk that project teams need to ensure they address is business value failure – delivering a product that fails to provide value for the business investor.

Interview: Software Systems Architecture: Working With Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives

InfoQ spoke to the authors of Software Systems Architecture on a couple of new topics, the System Context viewpoint and Agile, which have been added to the second edition.

Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder

Alex Papadimoulis discusses ugly code, where it comes from, how to avoid it, and how to get rid of it.

Architecting Visa for Massive Scale and Continuous Innovation

John Davies examines Visa’s architecture and shows how enterprises have architected complex integrations incorporating Hadoop, memcached, Ruby on Rails, and others to deliver innovative solutions.

Max Protect: Scalability and Caching at ESPN.com

Sean Comerford unveils ESPN.com’s architecture, what components are used and why, and the current changes the website goes through.

The Seven Deadly Sins of Enterprise Agile Adoption

Are there repeated patterns of failure on Enterprise Agile Enablement efforts? Sanjiv and Arlen discuss Seven Deadly Sins to avoid when adopting Agile in an enterprise.

Questions for an Enterprise Architect

Erik Dörnenburg answers: What is Enterprise and Evolutionary Architecture?, discussing 4 issues: Turning strategy into execution, Ensuring conformance, Where do the architects sit? Buying or building?

Wrap Your SQL Head Around Riak MapReduce

Sean Cribbs explains what Map-Reduce and Riak are, why and how to use Map-Reduce with Riak, and how to convert SQL queries into their Map-Reduce equivalents.