CLOSE FULL VIEW
Type Systems for DSLs
Recorded at:
Community comments
somewhat difficult to follow
by
Ranjix ranjix
Posted
somewhat difficult to follow
by
Ranjix ranjix
- subject, somewhat misplaced IMO. There is a reason why DSLs contain the D and the S in front, so they don't *always* have to deal with types :)
- minor corrections needed in the slides (recusion?)
- the eclipse code is unreadable, in the recording
I respect the try, couldn't get past the code presentation (again, for me, unreadable)
- minor corrections needed in the slides (recusion?)
- the eclipse code is unreadable, in the recording
I respect the try, couldn't get past the code presentation (again, for me, unreadable)




Hello stranger!
You need to Register an InfoQ account or Login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.
Tell us what you think