InfoQ

Presentation

Recorded at:
Recorded at

Business Natural Languages Development in Ruby

Presented by Jay Fields on May 08, 2008

Community
Ruby
Topics
Specifications ,
Customers & Requirements ,
Language ,
Business Process Management ,
Domain Specific Languages
Tags
QCon San Francisco 2007 ,
QCon ,
Metaprogramming ,
Domain Modeling ,
Business Natural Languages
The next QCon is in London Mar 10-12, Join us!
Summary
Jay Fields presents his concept of Business Natural Languages (BNL). BNLs are a type of Domain Specific Language, designed to be readable by any subject matter expert, which allows to create maintainable specifications and documentation. The example language is shown using Ruby.

Bio
Jay Fields is a software developer at ThoughtWorks. He is a early adopter who is constantly looking for new exciting technologies. His most recent work has been in the Domain Specific Language space where he delivered applications that empowered subject matter experts to write the business rules of the applications.

About the conference
QCon is a conference that is organized by the community, for the community.The result is a high quality conference experience where a tremendous amount of attention and investment has gone into having the best content on the most important topics presented by the leaders in our community.QCon is designed with the technical depth and enterprise focus of interest to technical team leads, architects, and project managers.
BNL or simple UI by Michael Niv Posted May 13, 2008 11:28 PM
Re: BNL or simple UI by Jay Fields Posted May 14, 2008 3:11 PM
  1. Back to top

    BNL or simple UI

    May 13, 2008 11:28 PM by Michael Niv

    I enjoyed the presentation. Thanks!


    Two related questions:


    1. If I understand correctly, the system is not forcing the user to type syntactically-well formed string in some controlled grammar. Instead, the regexes do the magic under the hood. If so, does/could it happen that the business user naively uses a novel language construct (and instead of or, or a meaningful "not" or "could" instead of "does") which the BNL designer did not anticipate, but which get swept up in general regexes, and the meaning is harmed in some subtle way that may be hard for a business user to defend against using the testing tools available?


    2. Given the narrowly targeted domain specificity of the language, a similarly targeted UI might work as well. for example:


    compensate $ [number] per [enum: $1M-profit, deal] if
    [enum: gross, recent_deals, all_deals] exceeds [number]


    (where the stuff in square brackets is shorthand for the appropriate HTML form-tags)


    Do you have insights as to which circumstances favor a UI vs BNL?


    Thanks again!


    Michael Niv.

  2. Back to top

    Re: BNL or simple UI

    May 14, 2008 3:11 PM by Jay Fields

    Hi Michael,



    Like almost everything in software: it depends. There are so many ways to translate external DSLs to executable code that it will depend on which solution you go with. If you have a strong security (or just general) concern you can use something such as TreeTop to create an entirely external DSL and pretty much entirely mitigate the risk. On the other hand, if you do something as simple as replace spaces with dots, then you are allowing for potential issues. Of course, those issues might be acceptable given timelines, trust, etc.



    Using form elements instead of a DSL is a commonly discussed option. I think it generally depends on how dynamic the language is. For example, I always thought trying to create SQL statements with forms was dreadfully painful. I would go with forms when possible, but if things are dynamic, I would quickly start considering a language.



    For example, my current project allows you to specify the following conditions:
    Date Range is 5/10/99
    Date Range is from 4/10/99 to 5/10/99
    Profit is greater than X
    Profit is less than X
    Profit is X
    Cost is greater than X
    Cost is less than X
    Cost is X



    And, so on, for many different conditions. This is something dynamic enough that it's painful to do in forms.



    I hope that's helpful, please shoot me another question if you want more info.



    Cheers, Jay

Educational Content

Brian Marick on 4 Challenges and 5 Guiding Values of Agile Software Development

Brian Marick takes us through a quick tour of the most important values and challenges to adopting Agile successfully (they aren't the typical challenges and values we hear in the community).

Are You a Software Architect?

The line between development and architecture is tricky. Does it exist at all? Is an ivory tower actually needed? There's a balance in the middle, but how do you move from developer to architect?

Agile – A Way of Life and Pragmatic Use of Authority

The word 'authority' sometimes produces an allergic response in hard-line agilists. Freedom and authority – both are bad if misused and both are good if used in right spirit for a noble cause.

Getting Started with Grails, Second Edition

"Getting Started with Grails" brings you up to speed on this modern web framework. Companies as varied as LinkedIn, Wired, and Taco Bell are all using Grails. Are you ready to get started as well?

Using ITIL V3 as a Foundation for SOA Governance

Those familiar with only ITIL V2 often scoff at the thought that ITIL could serve as a governance framework for SOA. With ITIL V3, the focus of the framework shifted towards service-orientation.

Adrian Colyer on AspectJ, tc Server and dm Server

SpringSource CTO Adrian Colyer discusses AspectJ, SpringSource's dm Server and tc Server products, OSGi and Scrum.

Adam Wiggins on Heroku

Heroku's Adam Wiggins talks about Rails, Background Jobs, Add-Ons, Ruby, and how Heroku manages to work around Ruby's inefficiencies using Erlang and other languages.

SOA as an Architectural Pattern: Best Practices in Software Architecture

For Grady Booch the foundation of a good architecture is patterns, SOA being just one of many patterns. In this Second Life presentation, Booch attempts to bring more clarity on what architecture is.