InfoQ

News

Offshore Outsourcing with Scrum

Posted by Kurt Christensen on Feb 13, 2007 03:00 PM

Community
Agile
Topics
Agile in the Enterprise ,
Teamwork
Tags
Scrum ,
Distributed Teams ,
Offshoring
Swedish consulting firm Softhouse recently published the second part of an interview with Jeff Sutherland [pdf], in which he describes how one company (SirsiDynix) used Scrum to integrate with an offshore development team in St. Petersburg, Russia. Jeff relates a key decision of CTO Jack Blount:
...he wanted complete geographical transparency. Mainly to optimize the project, but also he wanted to build a positive competitive dynamic between the teams where every member of every team on either shore, knew that somebody off shore could do their work tomorrow. So, he decided something that is very unique and there was a lot of controversy about. He decided that every team would be half in Utah and half in St Petersburg.
Martin Fowler and others have written about the difficulties of merging an agile process with offshore teams, and so some might be surprised to learn about an unqualified agile offshore success story. According to Jeff, two things helped the distributed Scrum teams at SirsiDynix work effectively with one another. One was the use of automated planning and tracking tools:
When you have many teams, every team needs to oversee the state of other teams, in particular when you have outsourced teams it’s even a bigger problem. So, you need some automated tool where all the data flows in and everybody can see it all the time.
The other enabling factor was the organization of the teams:
It is really crucial to have all the product owners, in the Scrum sense, very close to the customer. And you want the product owners close to the teams. Now, what SirsiDynix did... is that all the Scrum masters were in Utah, all the product owners were in Utah, and all the architects were in Utah. So they had very tight centralized control over the product and the product direction.

Related Sponsor

VersionOne is recognized by Agile practitioners as the leader in Agile project management tools. Companies such as Adobe, BBC, CNN, Dow, HP, IBM, Sony and 3M have turned to VersionOne to help deliver greater value to their customers.
Decisions over the wall? by Vikas Hazrati Posted Feb 15, 2007 11:08 PM
Re: Decisions over the wall? by Deborah Hartmann Posted Feb 16, 2007 8:38 AM
Featured in the Carnival of Agilists for Feb 14/07 by Mark Levison Posted Feb 19, 2007 2:34 PM
Re: Featured in the Carnival of Agilists for Feb 14/07 by Deborah Hartmann Posted Jun 26, 2007 5:12 AM
  1. Back to top

    Decisions over the wall?

    Feb 15, 2007 11:08 PM by Vikas Hazrati

    Since the Architects/product owners/ scrum masters were in Utah does it mean that the team in Russia was just being fed with architectural decision taken and they were not involved in the process? Were there any issues because of the Scrum master being geographically distributed? Did the team in Russia have to wait for a while for getting the impediments resolved? Though the results seem encouraging the one team concept seems to be missing within teams.

  2. Back to top

    Re: Decisions over the wall?

    Feb 16, 2007 8:38 AM by Deborah Hartmann

    Jeff Sutherland's case study on this team might provide the details you seek: http://www.infoq.com/news/SirsiDynix-Case-Study

  3. Lacking trackbacks I'm abusing the comment mechanism. This post was featured in the most recent Carnival of the Agilists: http://www.notesfromatooluser.com/2007/02/carnival_of_the.html.

  4. Back to top

    Re: Featured in the Carnival of Agilists for Feb 14/07

    Jun 26, 2007 5:12 AM by Deborah Hartmann

    Thanks, Mark :-) deb

Educational Content

Bindings, Platforms, and Innovation

This presentation focuses on the Internet and separating myth from fact, history from the future, and the mundane from the imaginative. Bob Frankston presents a vision of what could and should be.

Orchestrating Long Running Activities with JBoss / JBPM

This article explores the use of JBoss and jBPM to implement design solutions that effectively address the issue of orchestrating long running activities.

Neo4j - The Benefits of Graph Databases

This presentation covers the use of graph databases as an optimal solution for data that is difficult to fit in static tables, rapidly evolving data or data that has a lot of optional attributes.

Realistic about Risk: Software development with Real Options

This session introduces Real Options and shows how it can help in running your project. Real Options is a decision-making process that can be used to manage risk.

Communication Flexibility Using Bindings

This article discusses the use of bindings on services and references (including the instance of non-configured bindings) as the means to implement SCA communications in a Web and SOA environment.

Writing DSLs in Groovy

After a short introduction to DSLs, Scott Davis plays with the keyboard showing how to approach the creation of a DSL by typing working snippets of Groovy code that get executed.

Scaling Agile with C/ALM (Collaborative Application Lifecycle Management)

IBM Rational and InfoQ present, Scaling Agile with C/ALM, an eBook showing organizations how to become “finely tuned software delivery machines” by enabling team integration and scaling.

Concurrent Programming with Microsoft F#

Amanda Laucher presents a real life enterprise application written in F#. She shows actual code snippets, explaining design decisions and suggesting how to use some of the F# constructs.