Studies Concur, Small Teams Are Best
In the Leadership and Change section of Knowledge@Wharton, the question was asked: Is Your Team Too Big? Too Small? What's the Right Number? This article cites numerous studies and sources, and shows that small team size is consistently recommended.
Decades of research suggest the sweetspot may be between 4 and 6, as reported in a recent Fortune article: How to build a great team. But it's not that simple: writers uniformly remind us that other considerations contribute to team success and influence the "correct" number for a given context.
Some of the other factors mentioned are:
Discuss
Decades of research suggest the sweetspot may be between 4 and 6, as reported in a recent Fortune article: How to build a great team. But it's not that simple: writers uniformly remind us that other considerations contribute to team success and influence the "correct" number for a given context.
Some of the other factors mentioned are:
- clarity of team goals
- type of team - function, domain
- composition - roles required
- team process
- whether roles are clearly understood
- presence of an outside threat
- observance of team norms
Community comments
Educational Content
Intro to CLP with core.logic
Ryan Senior Jun 18, 2013
Spock: A Highly Logical Way To Test
Howard Lewis Ship Jun 18, 2013
Java Garbage Collection Distilled
Martin Thompson Jun 17, 2013
C++11 The Future is Here
Bjarne Stroustrup Jun 16, 2013
The Big Data Revolution
Claudia Perlich Jun 16, 2013
Sponsored Links




Hello stranger!
You need to Register an InfoQ account or Login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.
Tell us what you think