BT

Facilitating the spread of knowledge and innovation in professional software development

Contribute

Topics

Choose your language

InfoQ Homepage Technical Debt Content on InfoQ

  • Technical Debt Is Now Costing Us $3.61 Per Line Of Code

    According to a report by CAST Software, technical debt now costs a company on average $3.61 per line of code. The report's findings are summarized in this article and more discussion is presented from other thought leaders on the topic.

  • Is Technical Debt Still a Useful Metaphor?

    A discussion has been taking place on the LinkedIn Agile Alliance group questioning if "technical debt" is still a valid metaphor in today's global software development world. This discussion has surfaced a strong support for the effectiveness of the metaphor even after 20 years.

  • How To Pay Down Technical Debt

    Technical debt can be difficult to connect directly to customer value, but delivering customer value is what Agile processes are all about. So how can we track and reduce technical debt in an Agile development environment?

  • Is Technical Debt a Technical Issue?

    Is technical debt a purely technical issue that can be addressed directly by refactoring and tests or is it a symptom of a bigger problem? Will the adoption of TDD fix the issue or just cover up a symptom of something bigger?

  • Software Debt Adds Up to Substantive Costs

    In a recent article entitled “Continued Delivery of High Values as Systems Age”, Chris Sterling discusses the concept of Software Debt – “Software debt accumulates when focus remains on immediate completion while neglecting changeability of the system over time.” Software Debt goes beyond technical debt an encompases a variety of aspects that impact on the ability to deliver value.

  • Interview: Software Design Helps Being Agile

    In this interview made by InfoQ’s Deborah Hartmann during Agile 2008, Rebecca Wirfs-Brock talks about software design, the need for good design and the technical debt that might accumulate slowing down the development process. The conclusion is that agile developers should not disregard design.

BT