Panel: The Future of Programming Languages
Recorded at:
- Share
-
- |
Read later
My Reading List
- Personas
- Architecture & Design
- Development
- Topics
- DSLs
- Ruby
- Strange Loop 2010
- Haskell
- Domain Specific Languages
- Runtimes
- .NET
- Architecture
- .NET Framework
- Dynamic Languages
- JVM Languages
- JavaScript
- Strange Loop
- Scala
- Parallel Programming
- Virtual Machines
- Scheme
- Web Development
- Functional Programming
- Java
- LISP
- JVM
- Microsoft
Multiparadigm
by
Marco Ramirez
Programming languages are no longer just procedural, or functional, or object oriented, whatever, they allow to combine several paradigms.
Languages / Applications getting more complex not easier
by
Brett Miller
Brett Miller
www.customsoftwarebypreston.com/company
Most apps are web apps? Hardly
by
Charles McKnight
Re: Most apps are web apps? Hardly
by
Alex Miller
<eyeroll/>
Yeesh.
Mainframes are "relatively simple computers"?
by
Charles McKnight
Re: Most apps are web apps? Hardly
by
Slobojan Ryan
Let's flip this around - in your opinion, what would you say most applications are? Desktop apps? Embedded apps? Web apps? Console apps? My opinion coincides with Josh's - most apps that I see being worked on nowadays are web apps in one way or another, and that's because so much value is tied to an application being accessible on the Internet. Mobile apps tend to follow the same trend, and seem to almost always have a server-side component (even games now usually have communities rolled into them, e.g. OpenFeint or Game Center on iOS).
Transcript?
by
Andy Clapham
Wonder if we could use DotSub to collaboratively transcribe InfoQ content?





Hello stranger!
You need to Register an InfoQ account or Login or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.
Tell us what you think