BT
You are now in FULL VIEW
CLOSE FULL VIEW

Clojure Is the New C
Recorded at:

| by Robert Martin Follow 6 Followers on Nov 16, 2014 |
01:28:09

Summary
Robert Martin argues that Clojure is a replacement for C with its simple syntax and minimal semantics.

Sponsored Content

Bio

Robert Martin (Uncle Bob) is the Master Craftsman at 8th Light, an acclaimed speaker at conferences worldwide, and the author of many books including: The Clean Coder, Clean Code, Agile Software Development: Principles, Patterns, and Practices, and UML for Java Programmers. He served as the Editor-in-chief of the C++ Report, and as chairman of the Agile Alliance. He created cleancoders.com.

ACCU is an organisation for anyone interested in developing and improving programming skills. ACCU welcomes everyone who is interested in any programming language. ACCU supports its members by hosting mailing lists, running a yearly conference, publishing journals and organising online study groups.

Related Topics:

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Tell us what you think

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread
Community comments

Is the Clojure code available? by Karel Smutný

Nice presentation, I always enjoy Bob Martin. Did Uncle Bob made the Clojure code he presented available online? I would like to check it out.
  • Like
  • Reply
  • Back to top

Obnoxious by Philip Herron

Its entirely obnoxious and self absorbed that he thinks he can say clojure is a replacement for c. Thats like saying eggs are a replacement for oranges in real life.
  • Like
  • Reply
  • Back to top

Re: Obnoxious by Marcos Antonio

Totally agree.
  • Like
  • Reply
  • Back to top

Re: Is the Clojure code available? by Esko Luontola

The code looks similar to the one in github.com/unclebob/clojureOrbit
  • Like
  • Reply
  • Back to top

Re: Obnoxious by ryan martin

To be fair, he didn't say it WAS a replacement for C. He said that the intent of his talk was an attempt to make the case that Closure is a new kind of C.
That's not quite as obnoxious. There's nothing wrong or obnoxious with making an argument for some point of view. The point is to stimulate discussion.
In fact he did make quite a number of good points to illustrate that Closure and C are alike in some ways and not "eggs and oranges".

I don't really follow the "self-absorbed" bit.
  • Like
  • Reply
  • Back to top

Re: Obnoxious by Chris Kelly

I don't think it's obnoxious at all. Maybe the point was that Clojure may become as successful, widespread, pervasive and ubiquitous as C. Maybe it will one day have the same impact as a general purpose LISP in the same way that C has for imperative languages.
  • Like
  • Reply
  • Back to top

No! by jeb beich

10% name dropping, 50% useless reminiscing, 20% false analogy, 10% audience polling, 5% elongated enunciation, 5% useful content.
  • Like
  • Reply
  • Back to top

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

7 Discuss

Sponsored Content

Login to InfoQ to interact with what matters most to you.

Forgot password ? Don't have an account? Register Here

Recover your password...

Back to login Don't have an account? Register Here
Follow

Follow your favorite topics and editors

Quick overview of most important highlights in the industry and on the site.

Like

More signal, less noise

Build your own feed by choosing topics you want to read about and editors you want to hear from.

Notifications

Stay up-to-date

Set up your notifications and don't miss out on content that matters to you

BT

We notice you're using an ad blocker

We understand why you use ad blockers. However to keep InfoQ free we need your support. InfoQ will not provide your data to third parties without individual opt-in consent. We only work with advertisers relevant to our readers. Please consider whitelisting us.