InfoQ Homepage Presentations Java vs. C/C++ Performance Panel
Java vs. C/C++ Performance Panel
Summary
Hosted by Erik Meijer, who runs the Cloud Programmability Team at Microsoft, the panelists answer questions on C/C++ and Java performance, contrasting the virtues of native vs. managed code.
Bio
Martin Thompson is a high-performance and low-latency specialist, with experience gained over two decades working on large scale transactional and big-data systems. Gil Tene is CTO and co-founder of Azul Systems. He has been involved with VMs for the past 20 years. Keith Adams is a founding member of Facebook's HipHop Virtual Machine (HHVM) team. Todd Montgomery is an architect for Informatica.
About the conference
Software is Changing the World. QCon empowers software development by facilitating the spread of knowledge and innovation in the developer community. A practitioner-driven conference, QCon is designed for technical team leads, architects, engineering directors, and project managers who influence innovation in their teams.
Community comments
And who is the host ?
by Ravi Ok,
Re: And who is the host ?
by razvan baciu,
Bio is not complete for Panel.
by Nathan Tippy,
Re: Bio is not complete for Panel.
by Charles Humble,
Native code is not only C and C++
by Paulo Pinto,
Simply loving Erik out loud
by Alexander Shopov,
More productive?
by Mark N,
And who is the host ?
by Ravi Ok,
Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.
You missed stating Erik Meijer is the host. He doesn't mind, but I do ;) him as the host doubles the fun!
Bio is not complete for Panel.
by Nathan Tippy,
Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.
You missed Todd in the Bio
Re: And who is the host ?
by razvan baciu,
Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.
I totally agree !:-)
Native code is not only C and C++
by Paulo Pinto,
Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.
What I don't get in this type of panels is that every time native code generation gets discussed, some people tend to associate it with C and C++, given their default toolchains tend to be ahead of time compilers.
Which is fine.
However there are plenty of safer languages, with similar ahead of time compilers in their toolchains that seem to be ignored in such discussions, mostly on purpose, I would say.
Re: Bio is not complete for Panel.
by Charles Humble,
Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.
Thanks Ravindra for pointing this out. I've added Erik Meijer's details to the summary, and Todd Montgomery gets a namecheck in the Bio section.
Charles Humble
Head of editorial
Simply loving Erik out loud
by Alexander Shopov,
Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.
I really liked Erik's trolling as a panelist/moderator. It really livened up the discussion.
More productive?
by Mark N,
Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.
Sigh. As usual, people tend to associate "less typing" with more productive. It isn't true. What makes something productive is framework support, developer knowledge/experience/ability, tooling support and etc.
For instance with groovy i end up typing more than in java because i have to retype or fully type because I don't get as good as support from my IDE. Not saying Java is better , just saying things are not always as they seem. For someone who is an excellent typist and has total and immediate recall - they will do better with Groovy than me.