WS-TX as an OASIS standard

| by Mark Little Follow 10 Followers on Apr 18, 2007. Estimated reading time: 1 minute |

A note to our readers: You asked so we have developed a set of features that allow you to reduce the noise: you can get email and web notifications for topics you are interested in. Learn more about our new features.

OASIS has just approved the output of the WS-TX technical committee as a standard. This means that WS-Coordination 1.1, WS-AtomicTransaction 1.1 and WS-BusinessActivity 1.1 can now join the ranks of WS-* specifications that have been ratified by standards bodies and moved away from defacto standards worked on behind closed doors. As the OASIS announcement states, there were abstaining voters:
The ballot for approval of Web Services Transaction Version 1.1 as OASIS Standard, announced at [1], was completed
with sufficient affirmative votes to approve the specification. However, because there were negative votes, the Web
Services Transaction (WS-TX) Technical Committee was required to decide how to proceed, per the OASIS TC Process (at
[2]). The TC gave consideration to the negative votes but has voted to request the specification be approved. (See [3].)

     We are pleased, therefore, to announce that Web Services Transaction Version 1.1 has been approved as an OASIS
Standard. The submission of the approved standard can be found at [4].

     Congratulations to the TC, and the community of implementers, developers and users who have brought the work
successfully to culmination.
It is not clear why Sun abstained, but Fujitsu were worried about some of the references in the specifications to other standards/specifications being out-of-date. We believe the technical committee will update the references where appropriate.

There have been several articles articles on the history of extended transactions. One more to add to the list comes from the co-chair of the WS-TX committee, where he traces the roots of WS-TX back to the CORBA Activity Service:
The origins of WS-Coordination are in the CORBA Activity service, which itself was the result of an OMG request for proposals to specify Additional Structuring Mechanisms for the OTS Specification.
Who said Web Services is all about reinventing the wheel?

Rate this Article

Adoption Stage

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Tell us what you think

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread
Community comments

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread


Login to InfoQ to interact with what matters most to you.

Recover your password...


Follow your favorite topics and editors

Quick overview of most important highlights in the industry and on the site.


More signal, less noise

Build your own feed by choosing topics you want to read about and editors you want to hear from.


Stay up-to-date

Set up your notifications and don't miss out on content that matters to you