BT

Facilitating the Spread of Knowledge and Innovation in Professional Software Development

Write for InfoQ
News Articles Presentations Podcasts Guides

Topics

Choose your language

QCon New York

Find real-world practical inspiration from the world’s most innovative software leaders. Attend in-person.
QCon San Francisco

Learn what's next in software from world-class leaders pushing the boundaries. Attend in-person or get video-only pass to recordings.
The Software Architects' Newsletter

Your monthly guide to all the topics, technologies and techniques that every professional needs to know about. Subscribe for free.

InfoQ Homepage News Interview: Scott Allan on Windows Workflow Foundation

Building an Efficient Cloud Application Architecture (Live Webinar June 22, 2023) - Save Your Seat

Interview: Scott Allan on Windows Workflow Foundation

Bookmarks

Apr 23, 2007 1 min read

Write for InfoQ

Join a community of experts. Increase your visibility.
Grow your career.Learn more
OdeToCode.com's Scott Allan is interviewed by David Totzke on Windows Workflow Foundation, recorded a year ago at VSLive Toronto. Scott talks about the capabilities of Windows Workflow foundation, how it integrates into application development, how Microsoft is using WWF in its own products, DSLs and WWF, and architectural pattterns possible with WWF.

Watch Scott's interview on Windows Workflow Foundation (23:32)

On the topic of emerging architectural patterns for using Windows Workflow, Scott predicts:
I think Windows Workflow is going to be the execution engine. There's certainly the ability to write a lot of code inside of a Workflow, to actually put implementation code inside of a Workflow. I don't think that is going to be the most flexible approach, it's not going to be the best architecture. Workflow has the ability to communicate back to the host process and receive events from the host process during the lifetime of a Workflow through well defined interfaces. You literally define an interface that has public methods and the public events and you tell the Workflow "this is what you're going to be working with". Let's say I'm building a Workflow to download the log files from a web server. I can certainly create activities that do the ftp transfer, the parsing of the log files that do the insertion into the database. But ultimately I think you want to keep those jobs into separate components. The Workflow is really just the shell that says "here's the process we follow, here are the rules". It calls back to the host process which does a lot of the work.
Have any InfoQ readers had a chance to use Windows Workflow yet, if so, what were your experiences?

Rate this Article

Adoption
Style

This content is in the Architecture topic

Related Topics:

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Community comments

  • presentation is dated but still relevant

    by Floyd Marinescu,

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    This is the last of a set of interviews recorded before InfoQ launched less than 12 months ago. We decided to still publish it as most of the advice and scenarios decsribed by Scott are fairly timeless and the interview is still a great introduction to WPF for those who don't know that much about it.

    Back to top
  • it's useful

    by Caff Huang,

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    there are lots of cases where you're going to want Windows Workflow just to be the driver, the logic
    The tip is very useful for the soltion I'm trying to found in WWF. Thanks!

    Back to top

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

BT