BT

Facilitating the Spread of Knowledge and Innovation in Professional Software Development

Contribute
News Articles Presentations Podcasts Guides

Topics

Choose your language

InfoQ Live June
InfoQ Live June

Learn how cloud architectures achieve cost savings, improve reliability & deliver value. Register Now.

 InfoQ Live July
InfoQ Live July

Learn how to migrate an application to serverless and what are the common mistakes to avoid. Register Now.

 QCon San Francisco
QCon San Francisco

Understand the emerging software trends you should pay attention to. Attend in-person on Oct 24-28, 2022.

InfoQ Homepage News Erik Doernenburg on Software Visualization

Web Server and Reverse-Proxy Cache 101 (Live Webinar Jun 16th, 2022) - Save Your Seat

Erik Doernenburg on Software Visualization

Bookmarks

Oct 23, 2007 1 min read

Write for InfoQ

Join a community of experts. Increase your visibility.
Grow your career.Learn more

Erik Doernenburg talked with InfoQ about about "software visualization", a concept that he has been focused on for the past two years. Software visualization aims to provide a representation of artifacts at an intermediate level of abstraction which provides enough information to be useful but are at a high enough level that you can perform broadly scoped analysis. In Erik's words:

You generally only get the 30000 foot view where every system has a small little box or you have to ground level view where you are looking at actual source code, but that doesn't help the developers, that doesn't help the management and that doesn't help the enterprise architects. So we are looking for a way to actually find some middle ground to get a 100 foot view, to get a better understanding of software systems.

Interestingly, instead of imagining complicated modeling tools, Erik forwards a strategy for software visualization that uses a mix of some modest open source tools and manual customization. He likes in particular an old visualization tool called dot, which he has been able to use in powerful and creative ways to communicate hierarchical information. In a nod to the pragmatic, he also utilizes Excel spreadsheets for the analysis. And although the tools he uses might be basic, the idea is very powerful and is a necessary tool when attempting to absorb the context of large systems.

Watch the full interview with Erik Doernenburg (20 min)

Inspired by this content? Write for InfoQ.

Becoming an editor for InfoQ was one of the best decisions of my career. It has challenged me and helped me grow in so many ways. We'd love to have more people join our team.

Thomas BettsLead Editor, Software Architecture and Design @InfoQ; Senior Principal Engineer
Write for InfoQ

Rate this Article

Adoption
Style

This content is in the Enterprise Architecture topic

Related Topics:

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Community comments

  • Why not use Dependency Structure Matrix tools?

    by Han van Roosmalen,

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    Hi Erik,

    you are talking extensively about dependency and visualisation. I think you need to do some catching up to do. Many of the problems you express were already solved years ago when the DSM methodology was introduced. First in the mechanics problem domain. Since Lattix introduced this in 2004 an excellent visulisation appeared in the software industry.

    There are more tools starting to use DSM, but Lattix is the most advanced. It even allows you to change the code structure before you change the code. It even does not only work for Java (although it includes Spring, Hibernate and Oracle).

    For more information www.lattix.com. Just look at the demo and I am sure that you find what you are looking for.

    With kindest regards,
    Han van Roosmalen
    Software Architecting Consultant

    Back to top
  • i care visual modeling

    by ding jack,

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    I thought the important field of software visualization should be visual modeling, not the report of code.
    but his idea is fun, how about store our code in DB(instead of store in plain text file), and using SQL to get some reports?

    Back to top
  • Title of the suggested book

    by Rafael de F. Ferreira,

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    The transcript shows the title of his second favorite book as "An object oriented metrics and software visualization". Is this really correct? What are the authors?

    Back to top
  • Re: Why not use Dependency Structure Matrix tools?

    by Erik Doernenburg,

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    Han,

    I am aware of tools such as Lattix LDM and Structure 101 by Headway Software. In my opinion DSM tools are useful and solve a certain class of problems well, but that doesn't mean that we can now sit back and declare dependency management solved.

    To give you an idea what I'm talking about, have a look at Softwarenaut:
    www.inf.unisi.ch/phd/lungu/softwarenaut/screens...

    erik

    Back to top
  • Re: Title of the suggested book

    by Erik Doernenburg,

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    Object-Oriented Metrics in Practice: Using Software Metrics to Characterize, Evaluate, and Improve the Design of Object-Oriented Systems (Hardcover) by Michele Lanza (Author), Radu Marinescu (Author), Stephane Ducasse (Author)

    www.amazon.co.uk/Object-Oriented-Metrics-Practi...

    Back to top

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

BT