BT

New Early adopter or innovator? InfoQ has been working on some new features for you. Learn more

Presentation: Ruby Beyond Rails

| by Werner Schuster Follow 4 Followers on Sep 02, 2008. Estimated reading time: less than one minute |
In this presentation from RubyFringe, John Lam talks about his path to dynamic languages, some of the problems of making IronRuby run fast, and how the DLR helps with implementing languages.

John also explains how he came to work on IronRuby and where he sees the project going.

Watch John Lam's presentation "Ruby Beyond Rails".

Rate this Article

Adoption Stage
Style

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Tell us what you think

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

First things first by Matt Giacomini

How about we get a good solid Rails on IronRuby before we start worrying about "Ruby beyond Rails"

I know that jumping the gun is fun, but I would love a solid solution for Rails on .NET.

Re: First things first by Mark Richman

You probably won't get your wish any time soon. ScottGu & Co. are putting their efforts into ASP.NET MVC, effectively their anti-Rails framework. Why would you want Rails on .NET anyway? Ruby is the real magic behind Rails. Would you want C# on Rails if such a thing could exist? Probably not...maybe IronRuby on Rails is what you're looking for?

Re: First things first by Francois Ward

Well, technically, Microsoft themselves had showcased a demo of Rails running on IronRuby... it was just a demo as far as I know, but seems like the wish is closer than one would think :)



Not that -I- would use it, but it seems like it will be there.

IronPerl vs VB.Net by Ali Motaz

Generally speaking I would love to have Perl as a first class .Net lang, its the lang I know the most and the one I prefer

Obviously no one is working on it!


I have to use SSRS and SSIS at work, and I now have to learn VB.Net, its not a bad language, its just I'd rather learn an language I can also use on Linux and one that is dynamic!
If IronRuby was available anywhere VB, I would have definitely pick it up over VB, now being a first class .Net lang wont be enough, only VB and not C# can be used directly inside SSRS and SSIS, so I think the IronRuby group have a long way to go!

Re: IronPerl vs VB.Net by Francois Ward

VB only for SSRS (because of the way it works by expression, so its not even completly real VB, but more like dummyfied VB), but SSIS 2008 allows you to use languages other than VB, by the way.

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

5 Discuss

Login to InfoQ to interact with what matters most to you.


Recover your password...

Follow

Follow your favorite topics and editors

Quick overview of most important highlights in the industry and on the site.

Like

More signal, less noise

Build your own feed by choosing topics you want to read about and editors you want to hear from.

Notifications

Stay up-to-date

Set up your notifications and don't miss out on content that matters to you

BT